[
cust.idl.net.au]
An exerpt from a transcript of the Fox 11 report:
"Gina: Joseph's family declined an on-camera interview [Very true, and they said that it was because their lawyer had advised them against it, knowing as they do that they tried to kill Reinhard.. not that the odd murder attempt upsets Gina so much as an 18yo choosing not to play basketball when his parents have told him that it is what he must do with his life.] but they say that when Joseph was 16, the Jesus Christians began secretly meeting with him.
[Don't you mean that Joe met secretly with the Jesus Christians? The issue is really one of their relationship with their son, and how much interest they do or do not take in what he does.] "
[b:7a4f7b74df]
Dave is saying here, "Well, it's not my fault you didn't keep closer tabs on your son." Don't add further pain into people's lives with insensitive remarks like that one, Dave. Could our outrage be over the fact that your members were meeting [i:7a4f7b74df]with a minor?[/i:7a4f7b74df] Don't say it's not your problem if Joe's parents weren't more involved in their son's life. Were your members influencing him to deceive his parents as to where he [i:7a4f7b74df]really[/i:7a4f7b74df] was? You should not have let a sixteen-year-old kid hang out with your members to begin with. You people should not have influenced him to join when he turned eighteen. That's an ethical boundary they had no right to cross.[/b:7a4f7b74df]