Christopher Hansard
Date: May 29, 2007 06:05PM
[b:1d59f10cf3]Fact.[/b:1d59f10cf3] According a number of contributors on this forum Christopher Hansard abused clients for a period of years.
[b:1d59f10cf3]Fact.[/b:1d59f10cf3] He operated the so-called Eden Medical Centre, at which it would seem a considerable amount of abuse occurred
[b:1d59f10cf3]Fact.[/b:1d59f10cf3] A number of individuals were ‘apprentices’ or colleagues of Hansard and were ‘studying’ and practising, his Dur Con invention at that centre
[b:1d59f10cf3]Fact.[/b:1d59f10cf3] Despite the years of abuse, reportedly inflicted by Hansard, no action was taken to stop him, and the violations went on unreported and unchallenged.
[b:1d59f10cf3]Fact.[/b:1d59f10cf3] Such individuals have, thus far, insisted that they neither witnessed, nor were aware of clients being abused.
[b:1d59f10cf3]
Question.[/b:1d59f10cf3] As these people are telling the truth, and have nothing to conceal, why have they declined to add their name to a statement (posted on this forum) affirming that view?
[b:1d59f10cf3]Question.[/b:1d59f10cf3] Some apprentices/colleagues assert they themselves were abused by Christopher Hansard. Yet despite seemingly experiencing such maltreatment it did it not occur to them that others may have been subject to such abuses too, including clients?
[b:1d59f10cf3]Question [/b:1d59f10cf3]While apprentices and colleagues, at the so-called Eden Medical Centre, were ‘studying’ and promoting Dur Con, clients were reportedly being seemingly abused in the same building?
[b:1d59f10cf3]Question.[/b:1d59f10cf3] Former apprentices/colleagues of the [i:1d59f10cf3]Master of Dur Con [/i:1d59f10cf3]have an ethical duty to explain here why collectively, and individually, they appear to have failed clients who reported being abused by Hansard? They have an obligation to answer former clients why they presented Hansard with no challenge? To address the important question, were they colluding, and indeed complicit, by tolerating and supporting an environment, in which such appalling abuses were seemingly carried out?