The slander resumes (exposing Dave's projection from his post
[
welikejesus.com])
Now that David Lowe has (apparently) not followed
through on taking Dave to court for the persistent hate campaign
against him, Dave feels he has been given the green light to resume his
slander. He is back posting on his forum more of the same lies that he
has been spreading from the start. I might add that these lies are a
continuation of the strategy he has used when he threatened to hurt his
son's career if he failed to identify who the anonymous "apostate" was
and get him to retract a statement regarding Dave's doctrine on
unethical behaviour and a specific example of its application, then
asserting that someone else (Tony) was responsible for what I said and
slandering him mercilessly. The general attitude was that if we
refused to give them the information they sought, then it gave him the
right to make up whatever lies he liked. I'm afraid that Dave and
certain other weighty JC's need to wake up and face reality, because
it's not the way the law works.
It has been David's theory almost from his first post, that if you can
destroy a person's reputation sufficiently, then you become immune to
charges of libel because, in his thinking, "You have not done any
damage, because he had a bad reputation to begin with."
Reputation appears to be Dave's god these days where control is
exercised by his efforts to destroy someone's reputation, regardless of
whether that person is ever given a chance to defend themselves and
regardless of whether there is any substance to the damnation that is
meted out to people who do not toe the line, with the spurious claim
that if he's prepared to say something to someone's face he's justified
in saying it behind their back and he's being "open and honest" when he
shamelessly publishes his lies and bile. Anyone who dares to question
Dave can expect the full force of the JC community's rage down on them
and anyone else they wish to blame by association (real or imagined).
Dave, unlike most gossips who at least have the wisdom to preface their
comments by saying "It is said" asserts his speculation as fact
thinking unless someone can prove him wrong or claim the identity of
the anonymous poster he is seeking to expose, he is protected against a
lawsuit for libel. But the truth is, David, you would have to (in a
court of law) prove not only the truth of what you claim, but the need
for making such statements public. If you can't do that, then it
becomes your own vicious, destructive lie, and you get all the credit
(or all the blame) yourself.
So can you tell me what your source is for the lie that Private Eyes
is David Lowe, that "apostate" was Tony, that he has a multiple
personality disorder, that practically anyone who opposes you has a
mental disorder, that I am a 'sleazy slimebag', 'pig' and a number of
other farm yard animals etc? Until you do then you must take the full credit
for such blatant lies. And any who support and defend you in that lie
need to think seriously about how it may reflect upon them and the
organisations that they represent if/when your dishonesty becomes
public.
For the record, Dave is, IMO, a damned liar, and should be kicked out
of the Australian Society of Friends because of his efforts to destroy
their/our reputation, where he knows diddly squat about what he is
saying.