Re: The Work/Byron Katie-strong concerns
Date: February 23, 2008 03:28AM
ralpher, I've quoted you in italics.
Fasting took place, and there was also a restaurant in the hotel--a major hotel--and some people went there, and there was also a small shop that sold snacks, and some people went there. The fast, in other words, was voluntary. In fact, everything was voluntary. The program no longer served its own food, that's true, but there were the delicious smells of freshly cooked meat exactly ten feet from the large meeting room where the exercises took place. And plenty of room in the restaurant with no reservation required.
ralpher, I hear what you are saying. Yes, people could buy food and were given that choice. And, many people in my school went on fasting and questioning their thoughts about it because they didn't want to be the ones who weren't taking their School seriously. Everyone was given a choice, and they were also told to "follow the simple directions". Many people ended up questioning their thoughts and complying, instead of taking their freedom of choice. Sure, things were "voluntary"... but there was definitely mind manipulation going on for a lot of people, forcing them internally to comply.
I believe that the voluntary part was more for convincing us, than actually giving us a choice. If we were given a choice, then who can blame BK for what we did? Forget the whole mind manipulation going on... outwardly, yes, it does appear that it was all voluntary, doesn't it? "It's your School," she said, and do with it what you will... but the underlying message is always... that if you really want this, you will comply, and if you don't... there's something wrong with your thinking.
Nobody put guns to our heads... but hello? To me, mind control and manipulation is forcing... because it's not an informed choice you're making to comply.
I hear you saying that you were not one of those people. And since you were not, I'm inclined to think that you didn't experience the weight of the mind control going on there, and therefore, are not the source to define reality for all of us here. Am I not just as entitled to my opinions and experiences as you are?
Participants were asked at the start to turn in cell phones, snacks, and so on. I kept my cell phone, and I noticed a lot of people did. In fact, I turned in nothing, because I found that aspect annoying. I called my fiance several times during the nine days. I did it in full view of many other participants. In other words, this aspect was also voluntary. Those who did turn in their phones were asked first to let their families know they could leave messages for them at the hotel desk. Several times during the 9 days, people were paged to the front desk to pick up such a message. And there were phones in the room, by the way.
[/i]
So, you were one of the lucky ones who didn't feel the need to commit to the program and comply 100%? That's wonderful for you. A lot of people found that aspect annoying, same as you, and then questioned their thoughts and surrendered. I was one of those. That was the beginning of the self-doubt that made the rest of the program dangerous for those of us who were compliant. I understand that you did not allow yourself to experience that. And, I think that's why you don't understand the other point-of-view being presented here. If you go back to The School and comply 100%, then we can talk about it like equals.
There were phones in the room... but who would use them while they were in a total state of compliance and self-questioning? You seem to have completely missed the point. I hear that you saw people who were not that influenced by the mind control going on. I also saw some who weren't. I actually skipped one of the exercises myself, to go outside and chat with those people about what was going on inside. However, I also saw plenty of people, who because of their deep desire to "get what they came for", were totally compliant, blissed out, and losing touch with reality very quickly.
You weren't one of those people. Okay.
We were asked to spend 4 hours in a city without speaking. However, we were told that if we wanted to speak, we could use several phrases, including asking for food (this was during the fast). Again, this was voluntary. A woman in the audience got upset at the idea, and Katie told her not to do the exercise--she invited everyone to do what they wanted to do. I noticed her and some others stayed behind at the hotel during this exercise.
You see, even I... the skeptic... felt apprehension about revealing all of that detail, after being instructed not to. Obviously, the brainwashing didn't affect you in the same way it did me and others. I can see that you have no problem breaking Katie's rules, but for those of us who really "worked it" during the School, it's different. We were brainwashed. Voluntary or forced? I dunno. I don't remember being forewarned that I would lose my ability to choose and think for myself if I "followed the simple directions", do you?
We were asked to choose one day to be 'silent' and to turn around our name tags to indicate that to others who would then know we didn't want to be spoken to or to speak. This was our choice to do--no one could possibly keep track of what day we did it, or if we did it at all. I was mostly silent, except when a couple of interesting people had interesting conversations going on--and at that point, I spoke!
Good for you! What am I supposed to do now? Am I supposed to realize how wrong I am, and feel like I don't "get it" because my experience was different than yours?
We were asked to eat silently, and usually people did that, but not always.
At my School, it was perfectly silent, and when it wasn't we were hushed by staff.
Everything that you are portraying as pressured is actually a structured and voluntary exercise in the school. That doesn't mean you didn't feel pressure--but where was that pressure coming from? When you were in High School, did you do everything that you felt pressure to do? Did you 'feel pressure' to wear your clothes in a certain way because others did? Most of us did--and we learned from that. Did you not learn to not feel pressured to do what others do? Do you have a hard time not buying a new car every two years? If so, this is an issue to work on. It's not a problem with what byron katie is doing.
Yes, that's it exactly. Because I felt the pressure and you didn't, it must be something wrong with me, right? And because you didn't feel the pressure, you are the one that's right? Am I now supposed to question my thoughts and see this as my own issue, because I've acknowledged that everything wasn't peachy keen? Because my experience and perception is different than yours, am I now supposed to feel like I'm the one projecting, question my thoughts, and come around to seeing you as doing me some great cosmic favor?
Did you feel pressure to reply to the people here? Do you feel pressure to keep defending Byron Katie? Have you "gone inside" of yourself to see if what that's about?
Or is the problem all really about my teenage years? (And what the hell does that have to do with anything anyway?)
Nice diversion, though. I can see that you learned a great deal at the School.
There are those who take things to excess. I was recently corresponding with someone I met at the school, and she started writing in ways that seemed like Katie's words, not her own. Guess what? I stopped corresponding with her. It doesn't interest me to talk to people who can't think for themselves. I find it boring. As an adult, I have the ability to not communicate with people who bug me!
Guess what? Katie says "Guess what" in the middle of illustrations just like that. You also seem to be writing in ways that seem like Katie's words. I wonder why that woman bothered you so much?
In RR's collection of readings, there is a fascinating essay by a renowned cult-expert--Margaret Singer. She writes on the subject of 'why the US marines are not a cult'. Let's see--an organization that forces people up at 3:00 in the morning to jog 5 miles, that intimidates, harrasses, and verbally abuses people--that trains them to kill--this is not a cult--and why not? She gives many reasons, but one of them is the most relevant: the participants know what they are getting themselves into before they get themselves into it.
Have I not also acknowledged that there are things about The Work and BK that don't fit the usual mold? Am I supposed to now feel like I'm less-informed than you?
It's probably playing into the hands of the anti-awareness movement people (just about everyone) on this blog to make this comparison, but the point is that although you don't know what the exercises are going to be before you sign up at Katie's school, once they are explained, you are informed, and there is absolutely nothing stopping you from wandering out of the large room, grabbing a hamburger with all the fixins, going up to your room, plopping on the bed, and chatting with your lover 3000 miles away while watching tv. Or better yet, calling for room service or a pizza to be delivered from your room phone. The fact that most people don't is a tribute to how much people are learning from these exercises. And to some people's inability to simply say 'no thanks'?
There's nothing stopping people from walking out... except the repeated mantra/instructions to "follow the simple directions"... and the promise that if you do, you will "get what you came for"... which is freedom... and the constant questioning of your own thoughts every time you want to deviate from the simple directions. Obviously, you believe this did not affect you. You've made your point, and I openly reject it.
After paying thousands of dollars for a seminar, lots of people will go with the willingness to conform. Apparently, that was not your goal. At the School I was in, there were bipolar people, anoxeric people, depressed people... people who were obviously vulnerable and desperate... which equals a willingness to comply with the program.
BTW, relating to another set of questions, Katie's husband is a renowned--and I mean highly renowned, widely acknowledged to be a brilliant scholar and translator of ancient texts. He's involved in her work as well, cleaning up the prose, I think. Most writers have editors. It's not a pathology to have a co-writer or editor. In fact, nothing of what I have heard complained about here requires a pathological explanation. I'm not sure why so many of you require it. It's a kind of conspiracy theory obsession. Every idea you don't like is a conspiracy.
Every idea that I don't like is a conspiracy? It's stupefying how you just read people's minds like that.
I am acquainted with Stephen, and he's not so highly renowned or brilliant as you say. Renowned... among what group of people? BK fans?
Am I supposed to feel one-upped by your "infinite" knowledge?
Years ago, and I mean years--like twenty--I did the forum with Werner Erhard himself. It left a bad taste in my mouth. Not for me. But I feel no need to pathologize the experience as someone trying to abduct me, because that's not what happened. They invited me to sign up for another course, and I said no thanks.
Are we now supposed to see you as some great example for us?
I guess you just feel the need to pathologize those of us who have come to see what's happened to us, and angry about the loss of self, and are helping each other, then. Is that right?
Ah, now that's a comparison. You guys are like alien abduction victims. You are absolutely convinced there are UFOs circling, trying to bring you up into their ship. Question it.
Please, ralpher, take your own advice. I wonder if you have any idea how you actually appear to other people. You're like a walking contradiction, telling us to question these things... meanwhile you're the one whose not questioning it, but defending it with every tactic in the books.
Reply if you feel the pressure to defend, but just know that I'm done with this conversation. Until you start questioning these things, this whole conversation is totally pointless. You will not win anyone here over to your side of things, and you will not get the validation you appear to be looking for in this forum. I feel very sure of that. Good bye, and good luck.
-jj
Edited 4 time(s). Last edit at 02/23/2008 03:57AM by jj52.