Quote
boonetahoe
Yes, I have in fact polled large numbers of former graduates. And, the majority of trainees asked said that they were enjoying great value from the training (and this was years later.)
Have you measured your assertion that trainees have NOT experienced value? By your standard, isn't it possible that YOU are being irresponsible with your posts.
(Or, is it only "irresponsible" on this forum to be POSITIVE about LGAT trainings while we can be NEGATIVE with reckless abandon?)
Quote
formerimpactgradQuote
boonetahoe
Yes, I have in fact polled large numbers of former graduates. And, the majority of trainees asked said that they were enjoying great value from the training (and this was years later.)
Have you measured your assertion that trainees have NOT experienced value? By your standard, isn't it possible that YOU are being irresponsible with your posts.
(Or, is it only "irresponsible" on this forum to be POSITIVE about LGAT trainings while we can be NEGATIVE with reckless abandon?)
I've never made any blanket statements. I have merely stated, on many occasions, that I have never seen any longterm benefit with anyone that I have ever known. So to answer your question, no it is not possible that I am being irresponsible. Read my posts before you make assumptions about my statements. Apparently your natural knowing doesn't work as well as you seem to think...
Provide your research and I am objective enough to change my opinion on LGATs. However without seeing any research or getting a feel for your process I cannot be certain of either the truthfulness of your statement or the objectivity of your alleged research. How do I know that you are not lying for the umpteenth time on this thread? And yes, I was comparing you to Judas.
Quote
Provide your research and I am objective enough to change my opinion on LGATs.
Quote
boonetahoeQuote
Provide your research and I am objective enough to change my opinion on LGATs.
Hmmm. Why am I finding that hard to believe?
Quote
boonetahoe
Okay, perhaps your and my definition of "blanket statements" is grossly different.
Unfortunately, I can't go into the data, method, etc. without exposing my identity (and I'd rather not do that given the topic, ie. Impact.) Let's just say that my approach was considerably more scientific and with a much larger base of respondants than yours.
Quote
formerimpactgradQuote
boonetahoe
Okay, perhaps your and my definition of "blanket statements" is grossly different.
Unfortunately, I can't go into the data, method, etc. without exposing my identity (and I'd rather not do that given the topic, ie. Impact.) Let's just say that my approach was considerably more scientific and with a much larger base of respondants than yours.
Talk is cheap boonetahoe. There is plenty of information documenting the problems caused by LGAT trainings and specifically LIfespring. Many of the court documents and news reports are available for your reading on this website.
The burden of proof is on you to justify why Impact or Great Life is different even though they engage in many of the same practices that made Lifespring so problematic. If you have REAL information that you can provide to support your case, please do. Otherwise, shut the hell up and stop wasting everyone's time.
You have already used factual misrepresentations to conceal your involvement with LGAT trainings in an effort, I suppose, to give yourself more credibility on this site. The problem with that is that since it has become apparent that you are MUCH more involved than you initially pretended, your word is in question. Deception is deception no matter how you choose to wrap it up.
Quote
boonetahoe
Unfortunately, I can't go into the data, method, etc. without exposing my identity (and I'd rather not do that given the topic, ie. Impact.) Let's just say that my approach was considerably more scientific and with a much larger base of respondants than yours.
Quote
boonetahoeQuote
formerimpactgrad...Were you aware that I disclosed my relationship with an LGAT in my first post?Quote
boonetahoe
Okay, perhaps your and my definition of "blanket statements" is grossly different.
Unfortunately, I can't go into the data, method, etc. without exposing my identity (and I'd rather not do that given the topic, ie. Impact.) Let's just say that my approach was considerably more scientific and with a much larger base of respondants than yours.
Posted: 10-07-2007 04:36 PM Post subject: Re: What an "authentic" LGAT Might look like"
You did disclose a relationship with an LGAT. But you lied. Are you not an owner of Greatlife, Hans and Sally's bastard leftovers?