What the fuck is Chris wearing!?
What's that on his head!?
Laks conversation is a classic exercise in cult apology.
They diminish all criticism of the cult.
Never introspective, never taking responsibility, never considering other points of view...unsympathetic, defensive, bigoted, and cold.
They characterize (demonize, dismiss) the victims of the cult as "angry" or crazy or unhappy and somehow deficient. Ultimately critics of guru are so "wrong" that they are not worthy of company.
Why can't they just let Rama be Rama and be cool about their differences?
Oh, the ultimate "mad elephant offense". What a Catch-22.
Laks needs to look at his own ego regarding his position. Really disappointed in his lack of personality and preachiness.
I suggest any one reading this forum or Rama's blog review Cult Eds Ten warning signs of a potentially unsafe group/leader.
How deep in denial they all are regarding this cult...