Davejc is back on the job, spinning his paranoia story and rewriting history:
[
jesus-teachings.com]
I particularly noticed these eye-popping assertions about the long-absent Brian who he insists is masquerading as Apollo this time:
'He has said that he will tell authorities that the people working at Takatifu Gardens are, in so many words, paedophiles. He plays little games with words, like "harbouring paedophiles", sympathising with paedophiles, abusing children, taking advantage of children, etc. But it all adds up to the same damning lie. And he does this with full knowledge that there is NO PAEDOPHILIA practiced or tolerated by the Jesus Christians in Africa.'How, I wonder can Davejc be so sure of what knowledge either Brian or Apollo has? Is this him being the omniscient Apostle again ----or perhaps he had a prophetic dream that informed him what is inside someone else's head as full knowledge?
The long history of the JC's tolerating paedophiles in their midst is documented in this thread. Both Davejc and Cherryjc have defended paedophiles---because they have welcomed them and turned a blind eye as long as they obediently flog Davejc's books on the streets and accept servitude in his cult.
'He talks about "X" being a paedophile, even though "X" reported an incident that happened in his teens, to the police and to "Stop It Now" and they said that this incident did not constitute paedophilia, and that he had been foolish to have shared it with whoever passed it on to Brian and Franky, because of their hate-filled behaviour.'Davejc, no policeman in an official capacity or organisation dedicated to the cessation of the sexual abuse of children would dismiss the acknowledged incidents as not constituting paedophilia. A sexually mature adult sexually fiddling with children is paedophilia and against the law, no law-abiding body would dismiss it as not consituting paedophilia when it clearly is just that.
So the minimising statement you attribute to the police and Stop it Now:
'they said that this incident did not constitute paedophilia, and that he had been foolish to have shared it'is purely your own sentiment on the matter----and I seriously doubt that either you or 'X' ever went to the police or any other organisation or ever intended to.
Whatever would make us think that after a lifetime of selfish deceit (the 'honest to whom?' doctrine again) you would suddenly display concern for the welfare of anyone else, or worry about anything else but protecting your own hide?
Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 04/30/2011 08:24AM by Stoic.