I find "Alfreds' " posting (...he has here, simply repeated the prevarication of fables that David McKay said to me, to defend himself directly more than 30 years ago!....Alfred really being absolutely uninformed, and self righteously imagining to himself that those who proceded him in the JC's and then subsequently left, were not privy to the "insights" he has to offer ) in defence of the JesusChristians....
.....both simplistic and in many ways deliberately misleading...
Something we Jesus Christians encounter with unusual frequency is the tendency for some of our fiercest opponents to condemn us for things we haven't done, or for bad motives we haven't had. Amongst other things, we have been accused of being a "sex cult", of being "control freaks", and of being a "rip-off scam", aimed at stealing people's money! While none of us are impervious to being lustful, controlling, or greedy, one benefit of being on the receiving end of such accusations is that we have first-hand knowledge that they are either gross distortions, or total fabrications. You'd be hard pressed to find another Christian community with higher standards about chastity, democracy, and frugality than ours. In light of this, we can be more confident that the people doing the judging in these instances may have issues with being lustful, being a control freak, or being greedy, themselves. However, rather than facing up to their own faults, they have chosen to project their faults onto us, which usually says far more about them than it does about us.[
www.jesuschristians.com]
"sex cult"The JC
WOULD have become a "sex cult" exactly like the COG's were Cherry not to have refused to have herself and her children prostituted, and David, at the time, of course desperate to justify becoming a "Shepherd" of his own authority...and for this purpose urgently needing whatever "disciples" he could find(as everyone else in the COG's at the time completely saw through him and were completely disinterested in "following" him)....forced to comply.....
Alfred being utterly ignorant of the sordid past of the owner of the boot he licks.....(..and of course he now WANTS to remain ignorant of it!)...makes Alfred
UNQUALIFIED to "bear witness".... the fact that the JC's ultimately did not become a "sex cult" is no way credible to McKay
"control freaks"One might wonder why the only JesusChristians NOT to "voluntarily" donate a kidney are those whose age would lead to "bad press" for the JC's or those who are directly related to David McKay (i.e. his daughter and his wife) and hence have the standing of "royalty"..."Control may be exerted by McKay and his associated "freaks" simply by the award of "kudos"....to those who comply in a little universe where no-one has any guarantee that they won't be thrown "out on the streets" the next moment!
The Organ donation profile of the JC's (100% of those in a position to donate, in fact do so) clearly indicates the subtle coercion that is
STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE in McKays cult.....
"rip-off scam"The JesusChristians
ARE a "rip-off scam" that (
AS HAS POINTED OUT MANY TIMES PRIOR TO ALFRED AUTHORING THIS ARTICLE) do not have any public auditing of the money that they draw in or financial transparency. There are no proprietary rights granted to those who commit everything they have and years of unpaid labour to the JesusChristians in unconscionable "contracts" of involuntary servitude. No-one holds bank accounts in their own name
UNLESS they are the trusted cronies of McKay. No-one is free to choose not to distribute the puke McKay writes. There are no secret ballots thus enabling McKay and his cronies to readily identify those who fail to support him on demand.
The JesusChristisans willfully
DISOBEY the scripture in Acts 2:44-5 that everything be held "IN COMMON" (the JesusChristians were at one time (and still are?) registered under the Australian Company Act under McKays name...)
ALFRED FAILS TO BACK UP HIS DEFENCE OF HIS CULT
WITH ONE SPECIFIC EXAMPLE OF COMPLIANCE
TO PROCEDURAL JUSTICE ON THE PART OF THE JESUS CHRISTIANS....
I NAME IN DETAIL, MORE THAN HALF A DOZEN!
ALFRED CHOOSES TO DISINGENUOUSLY SPEAK IN GENERALIZATIONS,
NONE OF WHICH ARE RELEVANT TO THE SPECIFIC ACCUSATIONS AGAINST HIS CULT
..."gross distortion"...."total fabrication"....The balance of the evidence (I have specifically enumerated a number of issues) clearly supports McKays critics....
and Alfred's "projections" here (in language largely copied pat from my own earlier postings.....McKay being too stupid too to have any original thoughts or even language of his own!) do not constitute "evidence" defending him.....
.....it is simply an psychologically manipulative "escalation" strategy...the likes of which David routinely employs!
The strategies and structures of the lies that Albert here (..."yawn"...) repeats
DECADES later, "evidence" of outright dishonesty in themselves.
Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 07/11/2010 01:52PM by Malcolm Wesley WREST.