Escapesoon, Rainbow, Baockwatch and Free@last_sometimes welcome to the forum! I did make a very general comment to welcome new folk but didn’t have time at that point to mention all the names or extend a proper welcome. It is really good to hear your stories and comments, and to see the support people have for each other. That is quite a change from the Struthers experience, isn’t it!
Daisy69, thanks for confirming your point about confidentiality. I understand exactly what you are saying, and that people should be aware that posts can and will be repeated.
That is kinda my point though. Let’s say there is someone out there called Joe who is reading the forum and passing on gossip or criticisms or whatever. (I do not know anyone called Joe that is involved and am not alluding to any individual here, this is just an illustration.)
Does Joe live by a set of values? Do these values tell him what information to pass on? Why is he passing on gossip or his judgement on those who post here, but not passing his judgement on the things that are reported or the actions of the struthers leaders? That is hypocrisy and a lack of moral fibre. If “Joe” has ever passed on any information from this forum, and has a shred of moral integrity then he has to go back to the list of concerns in my previous post and pass these to the leaders. That is how responsibility, honesty and moral integrity work (no matter, kindness and compassion).
You also mention that there was more money flowing to the school, saying:
Quote
Also there is another bailout for the school. Money is being drained from the church.
Members are gladly giving to support it. Was originally meant to be one final bailout. Saw a pig fly
If you look at the top of p161 of this forum, you will see that on Jan 26th of this year, I said:
Quote
A more cynical interpretation would be that the purpose of the vote was so that people felt engaged and invested in the decision so that they would contribute more. That will not be the end of the story though, as their own accounts show the congregation has been subsidising the school for many years. I do not see how that can continue.
Seems I was right, and it was not (and is not) the end of the story in terms of the financial black hole that is the school.
What is it about the Struthers leaders that makes them think they are prophets who know the future when they are regularly getting it wrong and ordinary people with a calculator and a desire to understand the finances make better predictions than they do?
Finally Daisy69, glad you also liked the aside about the London “church’. What a bizarre situation. The emperor's new clothes.
Rainbow, I was interested to hear your comment that leaders have called this forum an assault from the devil. Folk that are still in Struthers, read the bit in my previous post that lists some of the issues raised. Then read the passage below.
Quote
2 Timothy 2v24
And the Lord’s servant must not be quarrelsome but must be kind to everyone, able to teach, not resentful.25 Opponents must be gently instructed…
So, what the Bible says is not, “if someone disagrees with you, you should say it is an attack of the devil and ignore them”. What the Bible says is, if someone disagrees with you, you must be kind and, even if you see them as an opponent, you must instruct them gently.
It is worse than that though, as this is straight-forward victim blaming.
Quote
Victim Blaming
What is victim blaming? Victim blaming is any response that explicitly states or implies that the victim is to blame for the abuse they have experienced… victim blaming often revolves around actions that a victim could have taken (or not taken) to avoid experiencing abuse… it deprives people who have been harmed from the empathy and support that they need.
Ignoring people and saying it is an attack of the devil is an appalling way to treat people. This sort of victim-blaming is at the very least unkind and unscriptural. (It also by the way exactly what standby five was doing when he said, " I think some members were over-willing to surrender control of their lives to the leadership": blaming the victims rather than the perpetrators.)
It is also clearly untrue. I defy anyone is Struthers to come forward with criteria that can be used to help show that people or churches are following God. Whatever they chose, whether it is confessing Christ, bringing others to a place of profession and commitment, seeing people emotionally healed, the fruits of the spirit listed in Galatians or some other criteria, I can show them people commenting on this forum who clearly demonstrate these things. How dare they look at fellow Christians and say their honest attempts to explain what the Bible actually says is an attack of the devil? That is dangerously close to the bit about “not touching the Lord’s anointed” that they enjoy quoting.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 03/25/2024 10:54PM by ThePetitor.