Christopher Hansard
Date: May 26, 2007 06:51PM
Re: Roger12's Comments
Roger, I have for the past year been informing people, associated with Christopher Hansard, of the bogus and fraudulent nature of his claims and activities. Apart from petitioning his publishers (which I agree should be continued) I approached a number of contacts in Canada, including please note Paul Nelson and Susanne Hare. I appealed, via email, several times, in an effort to alert them of the Dur-Con deception. Susanne Hare, for whatever reason, failed to grace me with a response, while Paul Nelson's replies seemed to demonstrate an unseeing devotion to Hansard and an unwillingness to accept critique.
[i:d51f0277bc]
"My experiences with [b:d51f0277bc]Dr. Hansard[/b:d51f0277bc], one of hundreds of authors I have interviewed, suggest he is [b:d51f0277bc]one of the most brilliant people [/b:d51f0277bc]I have ever met. Furthermore, the healing I have received from his personal care, the breakthroughs of workshop participants I have witnessed, and [b:d51f0277bc]the compassion he embodies [/b:d51f0277bc]are all gifts rare in this world which [b:d51f0277bc]I treasure tremendously[/b:d51f0277bc]..." [/i:d51f0277bc] (Extract from Paul Nelson's Email to Me-Dated 11/07/06-Emphasis added)
It was such obvious respect and loyalty that justified my reference to him as an ‘acolyte‘, not only that but he was recording interviews (Global Voices Radio-2003) with the Master of Dur-Con, that featured Hansard on a number of websites. I believe this can regarded as being 'engaged' and a form of 'promotion'?
Unfortunately it would appear that former associates of Christopher Hansard, either in the UK or Canada are reluctant to embrace any critical examination, of that individual, or his Dur-Con fiction.[b:d51f0277bc] For example note that Paul Nelson's communication refers to Hansard as 'Doctor', on 01/08/06 I put the following to Mr.Nelson[/b:d51f0277bc]
[i:d51f0277bc]Dear Paul, Perhaps you would care to expand on the academic, professional details of Mr.Hansard's 'Doctorate'. Or is this yet another example of fantasy and invention?[/i:d51f0277bc]
I have no communication from Paul Nelson addressing that deception, sadly he did not appear to welcome any further examination into the questions surrounding Hansard. Meanwhile my efforts to communicate with Susanne Hare have resulted in a deafening silence. These may be well intentioned and decent individuals, qualities I have never discussed, but their support, and active involvement with Christopher Hansard, does indeed raise serious questions.
Christopher Hansard could not have achieved what he did in a vacuum, it required, from those closely associated with him, a willingness to believe, the suspension of critical faculties, an enthusiasm to follow, and in so doing a surrendering responsibility. A very dangerous and unstable chemistry. But what obligations arise when that individual, and his ‘teachings’, are shown to be questionable? What is the appropriate ethical and intelligent response to critically important questions? Anyone of normal intelligence and integrity would expect, Hansard’s ‘Eden medical’ associates‘, to take urgent and effective action when allegations of abuse began to surface. Yet no action was taken. It is difficult to avoid questioning, if this constitutes a form of collusion, a complicity, as I have previously speculated, in the Dur-Con deception?
Roger12 be aware that Tibetan organizations have two principal, and urgent, concerns that demand their full attention: the political struggle for a free Tibet, or charitable efforts to preserve Tibetan culture. I welcome your idea to inform such bodies, but do not travel in expectation, I know of one group, that despite my efforts to brief them of Hansard’s deception, continue to promote his work. In that context I would suggest any strength we can muster, or efforts to increase awareness, would arise more effectively from our collective determination.