XKRISHNA Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Thank you for this, but what is a Captain Cook,
> please?

Aha, I see, a brief inspection. Well, what is the bottom line in this, please?

Did old Dave finally find himself on the losing end of some litigation?

“.....it’s probable that from now on, all the money that Jesus Christians obtain from selling books, pamphlets, dvds, etc., will go towards McKay’s legal bills......"

[www.countycourt.vic.gov.au]

Hhhaahahahahahahaha...Fah Kyoo, David. :-)

matilda Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Just had a Captain Cook at this judgement on
> Spencer v McKay. It is longer than the Murray
> but worth posting.
>
>
> [www.countycourt.vic.gov.au]
>
>
> Spoiler alert : Spencer won case.

It looks like David owes Ms. Spencer eighty-five thousand dollars, plus he must remove the defamatory content from the Internet. Do I understand, please?

"$85,000 in aggravated damages for defamation after the defendant, in a YouTube video with thousands of views, maliciously claimed the plaintiff was a devil worshipper who 'openly supports Lucifer'."

Spencer v McKay [2023] VCC 2238: [www.austlii.edu.au];

[twitter.com]

It appears that nothing has changed in the JC's. Dave appears to be as manipulative as ever and his daughter seems to be a chip off the old block.

This extract from the judgement describes a grievance in the community where the mother/ Lucifer is identified as the cause of the daughter's rebellion.


'At some time in late 2019, Ellicia went through a grievance process with the
community. It is apparent from the email exchange between Ellicia, the defendant and the defendant’s daughter, that, both prior to that email exchange and in that email exchange, Ms Spencer was identified by the defendant and his daughter as the source of some of Ellicia’s difficulties, including because of Ms Spencer’s purported support for Lucifer.
207 Ex P10 – Email from plaintiff to Ellicia dated 1 October 2019 at JCB 182
208 T913, L12-13209 T916, L14VCC:CD/LM 89 JUDGMENT Spencer v McKay f349
Ellicia’s response to the allegation by the defendant’s daughter’s that Ms Spencer“openly supports Lucifer” is illustrative. Ellicia said she had “forgotten” this. It is unlikely that a very religious Christian, who has decided to join a Christian community and devote her life to living as she understood Jesus intended, would “forget” that her mother openly supports Lucifer. The more likely explanation is that Ellicia had not taken the words written by her mother to disclose support for Lucifer or to establish that her mother was in fact a Luciferian. The defendant’s daughter’s rather disingenuous “reminder” likely significantly impacted the relationship between Ellicia and Ms Spencer in a negative way.'

What madness is this! Totally non Godly.

That would be Christine (wife of Robin) the daughter in question, yes?

Would be interested to see how McKay instructs the daughter in question to act...Full blown abusive communication and refusal to give her parent any access ... Snidely cheap revenge is McKay's 'bread'n'butter' after all...

Happy belated 53rd birthday, Christine! I never stopped watching from afar!

Malcolm Wesley WREST Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Would be interested to see how McKay instructs the
> daughter in question to act...Full blown abusive
> communication and refusal to give her parent any
> access ... Snidely cheap revenge is McKay's
> 'bread'n'butter' after all...

Yeah, that's Christine aka "Tabitha" (her COG name) the only one of McKay's four kids who has not rejected him. She just had a birthday, you know, a day or two ago.



Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 12/22/2023 07:16AM by XKRISHNA.