RUN_FOREST_RUN Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Hypocrite Tusli Gab-Bard, devout follower and
> disciple of Siddhaswarupanada Paramahamsa, Jagad
> Guru, Chris Butler, is once agian caught in the
> politiclaly self-serving act of sporting a
> military uniform while complaining about
> self-serving politicians. This modern day Arjuna
> is complaining about wars and politicians, while
> sporting a military uniform and being a politician
> herself. Pretty much sums up her politacl career
> that Butler had all his followers bolster.
>
> [
taskandpurpose.com]
>
A silent heroine of the invasion war or the occupation of Iraq. Weapons of mass destruction were not found. The world hegemon and de facto the financiers and the establishment sent soldiers to war because the financial system would collapse and the narrative was that the vile Saddam Hussein was very bad. Bringing democracy cost the lives of at least 1.6 million Iraqis. Only somehow there is no democracy there. And on top of that, it did not bring independence for the Kurds, one of the greatest nations without a state. They were just used.
Did Saint Tulsi Gabbard do at least one kirtan or round for 1.6 million dead Iraqis?
Politicians do shit, but the heroic myth of Tulsi Gabbard is that she was a brave performer of such a shit ...
> For a cult that claims it does not proselytize, is
> non-sectarian and all the other crap they peddle,
> they sure spend a lot of time and energy on
> proselytizing/preaching/outreach/initiation/endless
> mindless rules and regulations and any way
> possible to appeal to people.
Let's quote the saintly Balakhilya das, Johnny Baldwin Midget, aka Papa Smurf, Papa Dolphin or Grandpa Midgett:
"There aren't any new people!"
> So essentially Siddhanta Saraswati is criticizing
> something he boldly did himself (As did his
> successors: Countless maths, temples, centers—all
> organized churches of some type), but because it
> is not his religion (presumably he is being
> critical about Christianity, which, BTW, has
> "Living" teachers, like local priests and popes
> and so on, that bring the spiritual message to the
> masses—they just don't have an ideology built into
> their religion that asks us to surrender our self
> to such people) he seems to have some random
> problem with it when other people do it.
There is always a very high risk that an organization will turn into an exploitation tool, a convenience provider for priests, build a hierarchy of power, etc. Based on the gunas theory, in times where passion and ignorance prevail, the construction of hierarchical structures becomes natural.
Of course, it has its own faces and modifications.
In Poland, Visznu das, aka Vishnu from Lublin, Grand Vizir and Tapasya das had power. Women's circles of adoration arose around them. Once, while observing the behavior of Vishnu dasa, I looked at who pays more attention during the so-called quick lectures e.g. in the hallway. There were women there, there were guys. I watched to whom the Grand Vizier paid the most attention. Movement of the eyes, head, etc. For women.
In any case, they were the governors of the Guru, the local authority around which the next floors and levels were built. By contrast, the gender factor has crept in here - most of the leaders were women. A wheel of blind adoration has also developed around Tapasya das.
In next stages, where businesses took shape, a revolution ensued, and more power was given to the challenger, the aspiring leader. He got on to the council. Why? Because he had money ...
Money money money,
rajas honies
in your holy world...The mechanism of exclusion is important and how easily it is broken, which confirms that passion plays a big role.
For example, cult business gets rid of collaborates. Cult forbids - according to the rules of the guru - cooperation with them. A hard rule - no contact with them and those who have contact with them. Better to do business with people outside, who eat meat etc.
Let's get rid of these people. But the areas that these people served are falling to us. The rule of thumb is to have nothing to do with them and all related.
But the financial aspect, the money, breaks this rule like a matchstick. They ask people who have contact with the disfellowshipped and previously cooperated. Or at least there was knowledge that they would do it.
So easily, rules are broken in the name of money. So "rajas" breaks quickly.
Next evidence, Sweeties. No change...
Darkest under the lantern. Someone is pulling the strings over and over. Let's mix fairy tales = "misra". This remix shows something:
[
www.youtube.com]
Edited 6 time(s). Last edit at 12/24/2021 08:03PM by Culthusiast.