To Clarify on my previous two posts regarding Mahaksada and Babhru prabhu (alias stonehearted) from Hawaii:
You will notice that Mahak in particular (who claims to have no involvement with SIF and his siksa guru is siddhaswarupa) has been defending Siddha promptly for at least the last six years on all the main vaishnava sites.
This is convenient for Siddha and his followers (who have no involvement on the internet due to fear of hearing offences) to have an indirect follower do the PR work. Siddha avoids rampant criticisms against him, he gains great advertising, he maintains his holier-than-thou position and never once does he or his followers need to ever defend their cult.
Pada claims that Mahaksadasa has argued with him that 'at least Siddha is not a child molester'. He points out the absurdity of making this the qualification of Guru.
The other benefit is that Mahaksadasa claims he does not wish to hear any criticisms while he criticises Pada completely. So his values are selective, much like Siddha's, where he can opt out of a discussion based on this principle while he doesn't feel he needs to maintain it himself.
Mahaksadasa also has the secrecy around Siddha's group which assists him to act as an authority on the group having been there 30 years ago.
On the following thread multiple posts are made by Siddha's followers stating how great he is. The only prominent defender of those against critical questions is Mahaksadasa. He blatantly lies when asked about Siddha claiming to be Jagad Guru as this is the name as the author on most of his books and the title of his cable tv lectures series aired internationally. None of Siddha's followers attempt to correct this lie.
[
www.indiadivine.org]
The request for evidence that Nityananda was a Sanyassi and had fallen down is completely ignored and no answer is given regarding Siddha being a fallen Sanyassi.
Throughout the internet for many years Mahak appears to have acted as an agent for SIF. Babhru claims to irregularly attend SIF gatherings while the two are close friends.
On this thread valaya towards the end of the thread states (from the view point of a current follower in Toronto) the following:
Quote
Sorry to say, but it isn't only ISKCON, although they're more obvious because of the many temples, feastivals, etc. Siddhaswarupananda's group is actually far worse in this regard, in Toronto anyway. At least if you keep to yourself, you're generally welcome in ISKCON and you can just merge into the crowd, although you have to be careful not to let anyone provoke or trick you into revealing your inner faith and true sentiments (like in your post above!). Someone may act interested or appear sympathetic, then run to the authorities hoping to score brownie points!
Just act like a complete neophyte and try to appear grateful when they `preach` to you. Above all be humble and tolerant at all times. On the other hand, Siddhaswarupananda's followers are closely monitored and forbidden to have anything to do with ISKCON. They're expected to act like only their group and guru exist. Of course, he is considered the ONLY authorized representative of God. Someone like me is actively put through the third degree and NO ONE is allowed to speak with the `guests` until they've been regularly coming for 6 months. I couldn't reveal my past even to other `devotees`, let alone share books with anyone. I was almost frisked at the door and kept under constant scrutiny. Not that I blame them since I do understand where they're coming from, but it's difficult not to be yourself, especially in a small intimate group. In fact, I found it impossible...
[
www.indiadivine.org]
(*This thread has further discussion of Siddha in the early 70s on page one - worth a look*)
Babhru and Mahak discontinue defending Siddha as arguing with a current regular follower assumedly due to their involvement 30 years previously and admitted limited involement since. It's much easier to argue with those who haven't even the opportunity to see an SIF website.
This further adds to the fact that SIF is highly deceptive and cannot under any circumstances defend their cult and simply resorts to damage control as they have with this RR thread and the Chriskcon forum by using covert characters who anonymously attempt to assasinate Cara's character rather than address what she says.
I will post more Babhru and Mahaksadasa discussions.