Re: Christopher Hansard
Date: May 30, 2008 01:07AM
Chris_Farmer, I agree with others that it is unfair that your responses to Jeff Bowe’s questions on his blogs have disappeared. I note the same thing happened to the statement on the tibetanway website.
I remain intrigued by the whole tibetanway/Hansard thing.
On Sunday 25 May 2008 you said:
‘CH has no involvement with Tibetan Way and he is certainly not selling anything via that website.
I would however suggest that CH and / or his supporters are monitoring this Forum as only yesterday - presumably as a result of the postings here - we received the following email:
I have noticed that on your site, you have copied and taken product descriptions of products that you neither own or made or hold the copywright to either formulations, name descriptions of either brands, product names or product descriptions. You have done this illegally and no legal claim in any form to those descriptions, and you are informed that you are been investigated and all any associations of which you are associated with will be informed of your activities.
please note that the writer and others know the exact history of these products, which you do not and if you continue selling these products you will find action taken against you, thank you for your time.
One of the product developers"
This came from the email address [...] and viewing bonmedicine.com it is a website that was either created by CH or by his supporters.’
Goodness knows what the author of that message was on but, on Monday May 26, this slightly more coherent message appeared on Christopher Hansard’s website bonmedicine.com:
‘Public Statement: Christopher Hansard and www.tibetanway.co.uk
It has come to my attention that a range of products with which I was once associated with as a developer, have appeared for sale on the website: www.tibetanway.co.uk. In the interests of protecting innocent individuals, their livelihoods and reputations from the same harassment I have endured, I wish to make clear that this site has no association with me in any way nor am I involved with it other than my development and my colleagues contributions to the products currently being sold, as has been evidenced by the borrowed descriptions and formulas.
Those former associates involved and who are linked to the site know the value of the products that I and others worked hard to design for the period of 5 years, and have obviously seen an opportunity in using them to profit themselves and hopefully to benefit others.
That was quite an extraordinary turnaround in the course of a day, especially considering it was a bank holiday and your clients were not available – at least not to you. I’d love to know the back-story, if you ever find yourself privy to it.
Returning to the subject of this thread I cannot help but notice the little victim whine in the statement from Christopher Hansard regarding what he perceives as ‘harrassment’.
I would like to remind him and his supporters that he is not a victim and this is not harassment. He is a bully, a liar, a cheat, a manipulator and an abuser of people’s trust. Like many who post here I am here not to harass him but to alert others as to his true nature in the hope that they will avoid him at all costs.
In the midst of this little tibetanway aside the following curious message appeared on the ‘Christopher Hansard comes highly recommended’ petition. This was posted on Wednesday, May 28 in response to a signatory whose signature was for some reason removed:
‘As the author of this petition I feel I need to remind those attempting to move the battleground to this petition that this is a place of positivity. All that I can offer is that two negatives does not make a positive, two wrongs do not make a right. If you are who I think you are then you will know that apologies and even mediation were offered to those who made their grievances known in person, not behind alias’ on the world wide web. A fact that undoubtedly you do not want the public to know.’
Again, I’m not sure what the author was on but I wonder if anyone can cast a light on this strange statement. I do remember way back in the days of Adam and Eve Mews and before, that Christopher Hansard’s response to any criticism or accusation from a patient was a rapid refund of fees in cash.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 05/30/2008 11:37PM by rrmoderator.