Re: "Jesus Christians," "Australian cult," Dave McKay
Date: December 19, 2007 02:38PM
I am a brother of the Infamous David McKay
I am a first time reader of the forum, and first time poster. I've guessing it poses a dilema for the forum if I were to say that the LETTER TO DAVE was full of falsehoods. Because if you believe the letter, you would have to believe I am a religious honest person(pious), and therefore discredit the letter based on my statement that it contains falsehoods. If you don't believe what I say, then you would have to discredit the implication that Dave's other brothers were all devout Christians. Either way, it takes away a valuable piece of ammunition in the forum's war against Dave.
It's not that I want to spoil your war against Dave, I just want for me and my mother to be left in private. I'm slowly learning the rules of the forum.
Rule #1 - If it supports my point of view, it's absolute gospel, and it doesn't matter how I got it or from whom
Rule #2 - If it contradicts my point of view, it's a lie. (and sometimes very difficult to get past the moderator)
and we--our eclectic group of ex-JCs-- all act out of good and righteous motives
I find many of the posts you make against my brother amusing, and it seems there is no end to the dirt that can be found against the JCs. So I ask myself, why suddenly is this LETTER TO DAVE so valuable in your war against the JCs. Hmm, could it be only in that it is truly vicious, and truly hurts Dave? righteous motives? I am NOT amused. Especially that you use my mother as a tool for this vicious attack.
I'm trying to visualize WWJD. Just can't see him sitting at a computer anonymously cheering on a person for exploiting an old lady like that. It's amazing that of all the posts jabbing at Dave the letter, not a single post even hinted at the possibility that some of it might not be truthful. As much as you've cheered Brian on, if I were him, I would come up with something even more sensational next time. After all, no one on the forum will question it's validity. I want that next sensational post to come from a different source than my mother or myself. Seems the things you wanna jab Dave about the most, are the things in the letter that are untruths, and have absolutely nothing to do with your problem with his 'cult'.
My brother and I have agreed to disagree, and other than an annual social visit to my mother, we stay on opposite sides of the fence. That does NOT put me 'on your side' as you catagorize my mother.
One of my other brothers has expressed serious concerns over my mothers health since she became EXTREMELY upset and unsettled when he read the forum posting to her over the phone. BACK OFF!!!
I don't plan on posting anymore, but I think I will check in on the forum for a few more days, and see if I can figure out who really does have righteous motives and who doesn't.