NancyB Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Reepicheep Wrote:
> -------------------------------------------------------
> >
Shiloh/Kalona News...> >
> >
> [
www.kalonanews.com]
> >
> > A few quotes on the proposed annexation from
> the
> > article:
> >
> > “The city isn’t buying Shiloh,” Schlabaugh
> said.
> > “Annexation does not mean ownership. We’re not
> > looking to write checks.”
> >
> > "Current discussions between Shiloh and the
> city
> > involve Shiloh requesting a voluntary
> annexation
> > of its 200-acre property into the city of
> Kalona."
> >
> > "The current proposal would have the city
> taking
> > ownership of the water and sewer system, as
> well
> > as other already existing facilities on the
> > property."
> >
> > "Other facilities included in the discussion
> are
> > the main building, an amphitheater and
> > recreational facilities."
> >
> > “This would give us an asset we would never
> build
> > in a lifetime,” Schlabaugh said."
> >
> > "Shiloh would maintain ownership of undeveloped
> > parts of the property with the idea to sell to
> > developers."
>
> Thanks Reep for the article link
Burning question: Who exactly is "Shiloh" owned by? Who has the records of the original donors besides Harvey Bender? Annoyingly I state, again, that the vision was for a Christian facility- not for witch crafty occult practices run by a cult leader's 2nd wife and her new husband.
Who is Shiloh really? ( I'm holding my tongue here over the influx of people that were not from Washington - who screened them for Christian values?) Should not every donator or relatives be on record? None of us gave Hargraves permission to amass wealth on donations to a non= profit and the sweat of slave labor? We had no membership "contracts" or admission to the "church of Shiloh" like mainstream churches.
Should there not be records of those who contributed to building from the beginning?