[
groups.yahoo.com]
In this message the poster ML try to tell Harry Rosenberg that their need for transformation is coming from possibility and not from something is wrong. To come from "something is wrong" is a definite no-no in landmark world so you have to rephrase it into something like what this guy is writing. Which is a lot of words and a cover-up of the truth.
The truth being that a lot of people are turned off by landmark become there is something very wrong there. But you cannot say that if you are a believer.
As someone who has been there it is very interesting to see how the wording of the text while discussing what's wrong with landmark becomes long essays of jargon.
This quote from his post is "kinda" fun;
"The intention of using your text in the flyers was not to imply endorsement per se, but rather to facilitate a context of openness for this
conversation."