Quote
NathanA
Trinity Foundation has for the most part been a transparent and open group.
That is very far from the truth. Trinity has been sneaky and manipulative in the way they have responded to Wendy and me.
If it will clear the air, I will acknowldedge that Mark made a mistake when he said that Jackie Alnor had retracted her piece. She had not done that, although it would have been the right thing for her to do. The piece contains some misleading things which I have pointed out to Jackie and Bill, but she has still not pulled the piece. She is leaving it up, and Trinity is still pointing to it as sort of their position statement on this controversy.
Unlike Zeuszor, I do not want Nathan to go away, as long as he abides by the rules of the discussion and tries to stay on topic. I still think the discussion is more interesting if there is a devil's advocate, and since Trinity is not willing to discuss these matters in an open forum, I guess Nathan is their [i:4c6c563daa]de facto[/i:4c6c563daa] spokesman.