Quote
NathanA
Interesting.
Ole would not give me any real feedback on what Doug and Wendy have said because he said their board hoped that reconcilliation was still possible and a public response would only feed the mill. That doesn't seem to make a great deal of sense. You'd think a public response would serve to clear the rumor mill.
They do not hope for a reconciliation, they want Wendy and me to "repent" and come crawling back to them in submission. The only form of reconciliation they conceive of is us admitting that we are wrong. They are thus far refusing to take an honest look at themselves and what [i:24e94a6d19]they[/i:24e94a6d19] may have done wrong. And, John Rutledge showing something to reporters but not to us is moving things in the wrong direction if they have any true interest in reconciliation. If John has legitimate criticisms of the book he could email them to us, at the very least. I have emailed John, Gary, and others several times since leaving the group, but it is rare for them to even respond to me.
Does that sound like the behavior of people who are interested in "reconciliation?"