Quote
shakti
I posted this on another Byron Katie thread in response to Anti-cult's attacks on Jody Radzik and I will post it here with an addition..
Shakti, not sure why you feel the need to defend Guruphiliac Jody...have you seen the way the guy deals with any marginally critical post on his blog? Just vicious personal attacks, and raging insults the level of a schoolyard.
Where is the insight? I don't see any. ZERO. Just Ad Hominem..."you a moron who (insert insult)".
Where is the analysis?
I am not attacking Radzik personally, I am disputing his obvious false statements about Byron Katie, and what that means.
Now Jody is attacking Eckhart Tolle as a...
"flimflammer... Depends, the adult diaper company, needs to develop a product for the mouth to keep assholes like Tolle from spewing shit like this."
No insight, just insults.
There was some comment from guy saying something like...uh...I don't get it...Tolle costs less and is doing the same thing...yet he is bad and Byron Katie is good? And Jody's response was something like..."they are WAY different man, can't you see that, or is your head full of rocks and you momma is a...(or whatever).
Then he spews out some smokescreen about them, which is not even close to being accurate.
And pure blatant unadulterated hypocrisy from Jody Radzick. A 12 year old child could see it.
Well, guess what? Tolle is probably way less damaging than Byron Katie. Byron Katie wants you to FALL IN LOVE with her. Love Bombing, that is very dangerous stuff for certain people. She is running all these LGAT's, etc. Much worse than Tolle.
so here is the link to my response to Shakti about The Guru-Lover, Jody.
[
forum.culteducation.com]
and a coda:
also, as was mentioned already, jody deliberately distorted Byron Katies claims about God, and being God, and the rest of it. She literally believes she is God.
Why did he distort that? Is that right? Is it ok to do that, and not get called-out about it? No it is not.
I know the BK people would play word games with it, but she is claiming she is God, in a solipsist sense, and who knows what she really thinks?
Byron Katie is a master mass-hypnotist, among her other talents of personal persuasion, charisma, and manipulation.
No one is saying Byron Katie is Sai Baba.
But is it less dangerous or MORE dangerous for a Guru to being wearing robes, or dressed as a housewife?
If a Guru says they are not a Guru, is is true because they say so?
If a Guru posts hypnotic pictures Love Bombing you with her eyes, like Byron Katie, that is not a Guru?
Jody has said he LOVES GURUS. Guruphilliac.
philiac: suff.
1. One that has a tendency toward: hemophiliac.
2. One that has an abnormal attraction to: necrophiliac.
-Philia: [
www.google.com]
So that is what is being said.
Jody Guruphiliac attacks Gurus he does not like. Great.
And he SUPPORTS Gurus he loves, or has an "abnormal attraction" too.
So what's the problem?
His own blog means Guruphiliac = AN ABNORMAL ATTRACTION TO GURUS.
So which Gurus does he support? Just put a list on his website.
Why all the deception?
This is not the first time a bias towards certain Guru's has been noted about Guruphiliac.
Some folks never learn life is easier and better when you just tell the truth.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 02/27/2008 05:01AM by The Anticult.