Not sure what happenned in your interpretation of what I have stated in these posts, and we don't need to dog each other on the differences.
I researched out the Scientology angle that I felt was there, and gave my conclusion on my research. Which by the way is in agreement with what you are saying.
There was a few leaps you took on what my views are in this post that are inaccurate.
What the bottom line for me in all this is finding a crappy philosphy that has been floating around for who knows how long. It has been grabbed by different people over the years and tweeked to suit their greed, and need to develop whatever business model, or cult that they create from it.
Scientology/dianetics did have a strong influence upon the key LGAT founders back in the 1960's. Along with something called Mind Dynamics which I need to research out further.
But, the base philosphy is what I have been looking at in my research.
I am dissecting the philosphy. You can dissect the business model.
That's a good place to leave it on my end. Well that work for you?
No problem. No offense intended or taken!
You are researching Scientology and have decided it forms the fountainhead of all subsequent LGAT forums.
Counter to this, I think this is just an idea promoted by Scientology in order to garner the feeling of exclusivity and importance. I think you may be falling into the trap of thinking Scientology promotes something other than a closed, exclusive social circle.
The philosophical ideas promoted by Scientology do not belong to Scientology, nor LGAT technology belong to LGATs. The ideas have been around for centuries.
It is nice we are both able to state our opinions in this forum. I won't dog you with arguments in future...I just had something I wanted to say to your previous post.