Quote
Dynamix
After all, your readers trust you, and established trust is the device that landmark exploits to further its business. If you know and understand what this means, you have been more irresponsible than you would have been had your article been sincere.
Quote
godscribe
Dear all:
As a regular reader of Ms. Marble's work, I can attest that the big deal you all are making about this column is unwarranted. If any of you read this writer on a regular baiss - and it is obvious from your posts that you do not - you would understand the point of her columns. She writes personal essays (i.e. the first-person "egocentric" tone - I don't find them egocentric, but I'm quoting from one of these posts). She writes about stepping out and doing weird things and then telling her readers about them. There's ain't much weirder than going to a Landmark Forum weekend. I'm rather appalled at the lack of courtesy in these posts, and it could be because you all aren't professional writers, so deem it necessary to take down someone who is. The woman knows what she's doing, otherwise, she wouldn't be getting published in a print newspaper. (Which, you must distinguish from postings on the web, in blogs and even in on line "magazines.") Print products have certain standards, and Ms. Marble meets them as a writer, or she wouldn't get a hearing from an editor. Primarily, however, reading through these pages about this column, all I can think is that you all need to read the rest of her work to get the "point" of her Landmark column. If you are familiar with the writer's work, you know where she's coming from and the column is not misread. In addition, the publication for which she writes assumes the readers are well-educated and intelligent, because of the demographics of that particular community - it is highly doubtful anyone reading Marble's column would rush out and sign up for Landmark. Take a breath, dear people, and relax a little.
Quote
skeptic
What is Landmark's purported mission?
Quote
drivingthecar
Excuse me, sir, but I've been a paid freelance writer on and off for over 10 years (yes, for print publications) and just because someone has a column in the Podunk News doesn't mean they are a great writer or journalist.
Quote
Well.. since I started this thread: I was unsure of the tone of Laura's article. I was AMAZED that the publisher would let this article go through as a real "experience" piece, since it was scattered and reeked of the brainwashing/advertising for the program. So I posted this thread to get others' opinions on if it was "real" or not.
Laura: I'm not questioning your integrity as a writer. I think the program scrambled you and you felt the need to share about it (every Landmarkian does).
It's interesting that you had to recruit friends and family to defend you on this board -- it must mean a lot for you to be perceived as "right" here.
However, it would behoove you to take a moment and scroll to the top of the page-- it says CULT EDUCATION FORUM. You have just spent countless hours defending yourself to the CULT EDUCATION FORUM. Think on this.
Quote
To those readers who read last week's column and inferred that I have been captured by a cult: I can assure you I'm fine. I researched the Landmark Forum thoroughly before attending and decided to check it out anyway. I had fun, and I remain in full possession of my skeptical mind. To those of you who oppose the seminar and think I have piqued others' interest by writing about it, perhaps I have. But the purpose of my column is to cross boundaries.