Quote
Labor practices
Controversy surrounding Landmark's estimated 7,500 unpaid laborers has placed the company at the heart of an ongoing investigation by the US Department of Labor. Roger Gayman is a spokesman for the Department of Labor in San Francisco, where Landmark is based. In March of 2006, he confirmed that the DOL has launched an investigation into Landmark’s labor practices. “It’s an ongoing investigation,” said Gayman. “At this time I can’t comment on this or any prior investigations involving Landmark Education.”[citation needed][44]
Quote
As of 1998, Landmark Education had previously been investigated by the United States Department of Labor, according to an article in Metroactive Features :
Someone running a math racket or a skepticism racket or both could calculate pretty easily for these volunteers that their chances of becoming a Forum leader ping-pong between microscopic and infinitesimal. A case study by Harvard Business School reports that nationwide, 7,500 volunteers lend their time and services to Landmark. The corporation only pays 451 people, and only a tenth of them are Forum leaders. But here at the Forum, we are told, anything is possible. So devotees keep enrolling in courses, keep volunteering to prove their "commitment." I wonder what kind of racket the Department of Labor was running when it investigated Landmark and determined its volunteers were employees subject to the provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act. Who's heard of volunteers for a for-profit? In the end the Department of Labor dropped the issue, leaving Landmark trumpeting about its volunteers' choice in the matter. [45]
Quote
In France, Landmark Education assistants had the apparent French legal status of volunteer unpaid workers. On May 24, 2004, the France 3 television network show Pièces à conviction broadcast the investigative report (" Voyage to the land of the new gurus"), addressing (amongst other issues) the matter of volunteer labor. In June 2004, the French labor agency (L’Inspection du Travail) investigated labor practices regarding "volunteer workers". Shortly thereafter, Landmark Education officially ended its operations in France. [46]
Quote
You can see just below that part of the Wiki entry, the Landmark representatives have made entries saying how they are "training" those folks to be Leaders, and lots of other lies along those lines.
If there are people who actually did that "unpaid labor" for Landmark, you could probably file a complaint with the Dept of Labor.
I think what will bring Landmark down are some legal technicalities. They got Al Capone for tax-evasion, not for his criminal activities.
So if you did a bunch of "free labor" for Landmark, you could write up what happened, and then submit it to the Dept of Labor, and maybe something will come of it.
Quote
How do they get by with the term 'VOLUNTEER' for a FOR-profit organization?? I don't get that. I can see 'intern' but even interns have laws associated with them, don't they?
Quote
sonnie_deeQuote
How do they get by with the term 'VOLUNTEER' for a FOR-profit organization?? I don't get that. I can see 'intern' but even interns have laws associated with them, don't they?
They don't call them volunteers, they are people who are registered in the assisting programme. The "volunteers" don't pay to do the programme, they assist around the centre and on courses and benefit from it by getting free coaching.
Its all a big sham, people don't get anywhere near as much as what Landmark says they will
Quote
Today, speaking to someone who lives in France, I learnt that Landmark has left France, Belgium, Sweden, and Switzerland!
He says he'll try to find out more for me about the details in these cases, although language is obviously a problem.
It would be good to find out more info that can be posted in English.
The more examples of countries giving this bunch the boot, the better it is. Hopefully such evidence will help get the Department of Labor to intensify their investigation into Landmark.
From there, hopefully, the entire LGAT industry!