There was an email going around of just the right length for a flyer that Landmark tried to sue out of existence. Here it is:Quote
Attempting to inform/educate potential recruits is a great thing to do. I wish someone had been outside the intro session I went to. I had some suspicions and saw some red flags at the session. Had there been some activists outside with info (and it doesn't have to be a DVD, just a "warning/buyer beware" flyer with a short message about the nature of the so-called "course" with references to learn more), I like to think that I would have said NO THANKS!
This info is from the introduction to the litigation archive (a very useful read).Quote
I don't understand :?
The link to the lawsuit didn't work. What happened? Landmark was prepared to sue if a flyer was distributed outside their recruitment (intro) sessions?
This info is from the introduction to the litigation archive (a very useful read).
"In 2001, another lawsuit -- this one against the anonymous author of a widely circulated e-mail critical of Landmark.s programs -- was filed and withdrawn."
The link for the lawsuit is here:
Landmark (hilariously) tried to sue the anonymous author of the email. I was quoting the email itself:
Jack Oskar Larm
Could someone send me a copy? I would then make a few copies and start distribution. You see, where I live the good folk (generally speaking) are dry sponges for this type of thing. My town's kind of alternative and Landmark is a strong presence here. I would start by handing out copies here and it would surely make an impact on recruitment.