no longer possible for informed people
Observe more of their trademark rhetorical slipperyness, like these guys should become spokespersons for Teflon....
A. "no longer possible" begs the questions, 1. when WAS it possible ?, 2, WHY was it possible ? aaaaand, on what authority do they assert that is is now "not possible" ? Note the ascencion to divinity here.... Rosenberg states (using the typical confused LECthink that conflates description of physical reality with matters of conjecture and opinion) that it simply "isn't possible" as one would be, say, stating Newton's Third Law Of Motion, (and attempting to elevate a murky philosophy to the status of hard science)
B. "for informed people" begs the question, 1. what constitutes an "informed person" ? 2. are they choosing to define an "informed person" as anyone who is in agreement with them and only such persons ? 3. if anyone, however educated or accomplished, does not agree with them, then does that automatically make that person "uninformed" (or infidel) ???, and 4, HOW did said "informed person" undergo this process of becoming informed ??? (you will note here a strong dependency upon circular logic here, a hallmark of, regrettably, an uninformed person.....)
These people have an awe inspiring capacity to load the worst garbage logic into the simplest of statements.... it IS a gift of sorts...
Such false reasonability, such pompous arrogance masquerading as humility, such manipulative crap.