Current Page: 3 of 4
Re: Gurdjieff
Posted by: cber7 ()
Date: August 08, 2008 12:34AM

Quote
bill77
Truth is not for those who are respectable, nor for those who desire
self-extension, self-fulfillment. Truth is not for those who are seeking
security, permanency; for the permanency they seek is merely the opposite of
impermanency. Being caught in the net of time, they seek that which is
permanent, but the permanent they seek is not the real because what they seek is
the product of their thought. Therefore, a man who would discover reality must
cease to seek - which does not mean that he must be contented with what is. On
the contrary, a man who is intent upon the discovery of truth must be inwardly a
complete revolutionary. He cannot belong to any class, to any nation, to any
group or ideology, to any organized religion; for truth is not in the temple or
the church, truth is not to be found in the things made by the hand or by the
mind. Truth comes into being only when the things of the mind and of the hand
are put aside, and that putting aside of the things of the mind and
of the hand is not a matter of time. Truth comes to him who is free of time,
who is not using time as a means of self-extension. Time means memory of
yesterday, memory of your family, of your race, of your particular character, of
the accumulation of your experience which makes up the 'me' and the 'mine'.



what you are conveying is that you regard gurdjieff as nietzsche with neo-platonic leanings. i don't know if he'd go for that but it does suit him given the era in which he lived and his early personal background.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 08/08/2008 12:40AM by cber7.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Gurdjieff
Posted by: bill77 ()
Date: August 08, 2008 09:14PM

One more thought on the subject.....
…If you are a Christian, your visions follow a certain pattern; if you are a
Hindu, a Buddhist, or a Muslim, they follow a different pattern. You see Christ
or Krishna, according to your conditioning; your education, the culture in which
you have been brought up, determines your visions. Which is the actuality: the
vision, or the mind which has been shaped in a certain mold? The vision is the
projection of the particular tradition which happens to form the background of
the mind. This conditioning, not the vision which it projects, is the actuality,
the fact. To understand the fact is simple; but it is made difficult by our
likes and dislikes, by our condemnation of the fact, by the opinions or
judgments we have about the fact. To be free of these various forms of
evaluation is to understand the actual, the what is.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Gurdjieff
Posted by: corboy ()
Date: August 08, 2008 10:34PM

Quote

This conditioning, not the vision which it projects, is the actuality,
the fact. To understand the fact is simple; but it is made difficult by our
likes and dislikes, by our condemnation of the fact, by the opinions or
judgments we have about the fact. To be free of these various forms of
evaluation is to understand the actual, the what is.

Thats what they tell the new recruits. Very reassuring.

Later, you get told in Gurdy work about weird stuff like having a 'kundabuffer'.

(Bill here can try and tell us about the kundabuffer)

All joking aside, Ouspensky reported in his book In Search of the Miraculous that he had practiced 'self-remembering' according to Gurdjieff's instructions. Ouspensky had been a seeker long before meeting Gurdjieff and had tried meditation and even hashish and nitrous oxide, seaching for consciousness expanding methods.

One day while practicing self remembering, Ouspensky set out to do some tasks. That afternoon, he 'came to'. To his amazement, discovered he had spent half the day, going around town and had done his errands.

In other words, practicing G's method, and being instructed in this by G himself had sent Ouspensky into several hours of what a modern clinicial would call a dissociative fugue/amnesia state.

Ouspensky thought this was some special attainment. He did not understand that his field of attention had fractured,and that this was potentially harmful and not helpful.

It was also fortunate that Ouspensky had spent the day on foot or using a horse drawn taxicab. For had he gone through this fugue/dissociation while driving an automobile, the consequences could have been dire.

Actually according to G, one was never supposed to recruit or proslytize. A seeker was supposed to find the teacher, if the seeker was ready. Teachers were not supposed to recruit. So...anyone who does isnt the real thing.

Or that your teacher is a higher level than you and therefore you have to hand over your money. Gurdjieff used to give constructive feedback to students doing his dances saying they moved 'liked worms in shit.'

And somehow, in Nazi occuppied Paris, he managed to stay put in his apartment and his kitchen and pantry were well supplied with food.

An overview here:

[www.geocities.com]

A report from someone who served time and got out here:

[fourthwaycult.net]

Finally this person offered a first hand description of what happened when he or she tried G work twenty years ago...and did it through the G Foundation.

Quote
Moon Food, posting on Google listserve wrote:
Moon Food View profile
More options Sep 3 1998, 12:00 am

Newsgroups: alt.consciousness.4th-way, alt.consciousness, alt.meditation, alt.yoga, talk.religion.newage
From: Moon Food <no...@nothere.org>
Date: 1998/09/03
Subject: A real experience with the Gurdjieff Work
Reply to author | Forward | Print | View thread | Show original | Report this message | Find messages by this author

I have written the following as a warning regarding involvement in
the Gurdjieff work. Writing and posting it also provides me with
something of a catharsis. The lessons to be drawn from my experience, I think, are generalizable beyond the Gurdjieff work.

I think the chief lesson is this: there is a difference between the spiritual and the psychic, between realizing God within and invoking or manipulating psychic energies.

Of course, my bizarre experiences were unique to me. Despite that
fact, they are still telling and recounting them might be of value to
those interested in the Fourth Way, as well as all spiritual seekers.

Any comments should be posted to the newsgroup.

In the summer of 1997, spurred by a hankering for the spiritual, I
searched the Internet and came across something called the Fourth Way.
I investigated it, found that a well known and respected Gurdjieff
organization had a branch right in my city, and by September, I was
attending their meetings.

Our particular group was a beginners' group. We met once a week.
Each meeting began with a “sitting.” The sitting is a kind of
meditation. It involves scanning, sensing, the body part by part.
Sensing one’s physical body. It lasts for about 30 minutes. At the
meeting, the sitting is guided by the leader. We were expected to sit
at home each morning on our own.

The sitting is followed by a period, lasting about one hour, during
which everyone sits in a circle. This is led by several group leaders,
experienced in "the Work." Students ask questions, and the leaders take
turns answering the questions.

The group also meets on the weekend on Saturday. On these
Saturdays, we would do actual physical work, having at the beginning of
the day received an "assignment," (e.g., directing attention to the
bottom of one's feet). The work period would be followed by a group
meal, and then by a reading from _Beelzebub's Tales to His Grandson_.

I was attending meetings and sitting every day beginning in late
September. I followed the advice given during meetings very precisely.
I was very attentive at the meetings. (I'm a pretty good listener, with
a better than average oral memory.)

For instance, during one meeting, we heard a reading from something
written by John Pentland, which described how to "receive an
impression." Now, Gurdjieff teaches that sensory impressions are a kind
of "food" that is transformed in the human body to eventually create an
astral body, then a "mental" body.

I followed these instructions to the letter, and, lo and behold, something very mysterious happened.

When I looked at something in the manner instructed, it would shift and move around, and, eventually, waves of yellowish green light would emanate from the thing and moved toward me.

After a few months of intensely practicing this, unfortunately, my entire field of vision was moving. I felt like a passenger on the good ship Gurdjieff. This took awhile to wear off after I stopped "receiving impressions."

More importantly, we were told that we would eventually receive a
flow of energy beginning at the top of the head, moving down the spine,
coming up the front through the genital area and up the chest and the
face. By November, I began to experience this flow. I was told that
this was *very* early for a beginner; the average length of time for
this to start, I was told, was after about 5 years of practice. I was
thrilled and amazed. My former scientistic atheism was definitely out
the window.

I mentioned this in private to my group leader, and she
encouraged me to share it with the group. She told me that this was a
significant milestone in the work.

In the next few weeks, my "third eye" apparently opened. I had felt
a kind of pressure and slight pain in my forehead. Now there was a
definite sensation of fluid running from my forehead down my nose and
cheeks. Of course, there was no actual fluid to be found. I suspect
that this was also "expected."

But then something bizarre started that was not "supposed" to
happen.

By the end of November, invisible hands began caressing me, touching
me. They would touch my back, my head, my face. It was uncanny. I
thought that these were spiritual helpers of some kind. They started to
direct my movements, always gently, lifting me to a standing position,
moving my head to one side or back, etc. When I would go through
periods of receiving the energy (and these periods could last for
several hours, as I sat in my room at the edge of my bed, just trying to
keep my back straight and enduring the often uncomfortable force of the
inflow of energy), the hands often came. Then, they started some kind
of construction project on me. They injected some kind of material
into my forehead (apparently, my “third eye” had opened by now). They
sprinkled and then spread some kind of material on my back and legs.

I told my group leader about being “under construction” but she didn’t
have much to say about it. I don't think she initially understood the
magnitude of what I was experiencing.

Things got more complicated in December.

In addition to the hands, I was visited by what I can only describe as “creatures”. They seemed like a sort of animal. They would glom onto my legs and bite my toes!!

At this point, I figured that all was not well.

These creatures came mostly at night, and especially when I went to bed. I

would feel something like a hot blob, very large, sucking on my leg, and along with that sensation there would be the biting of my toes. I figured that these were some kind of creature from another dimension, feeding off of me. I was strangely accepting of it. It didn’t freak me out that much, because at the time I thought this just went with spiritual advancement – an occupational hazard.

The creatures would also bite the top of my head. And other creatures, which seemed somehow different, would sort of lick my face.

At the end of December, things took a turn for the worse.

The hands, or at least *some* hands, actually began to sexually manipulate me. They were masturbating me. It was absolutely unmistakable. I also felt like some kind of suction apparatus at times was affixed to my penis, and that something like a very thin catheter was being inserted into my penis.

While this was happening, I kind of joked to myself, “Okay, when do I get the rectal probe?” Because this reminded me very
much of what UFO abductees describe.

After this, the hands became more obtrusive and obnoxious.

For instance, when I got on a plane to fly back home after visiting my
family in another state, they poked me in the ass. Stuff like that.
When I would have my periods of energy flow, they would put their arm
around my neck to block the flow, or put a hand under my chin to divert
the flow.

Some other bizarre things occured. One was the fact that the
“entities” created some kind of electrical “plug” on my back that they
would occasionally tap into, creating a kind of buzzing sensation
there. The other thing was that they installed some kind of living
thing, like a huge worm, inside my torso.

This living thing would move around inside of me. Fortunately, I don’t experience either of these phenomena anymore.


After Christmas, I was quite sure that my little friends were not
angels from God.

When I got back home, I told my group leader about
them in great detail. She said that this was all beyond her experience,
and suggested I speak to the leader that came from New York once a
month.

When I talked to him in mid-January, he told me I needed to see
a psychiatrist, and that my experiences had nothing to do with “the
Work.”

He told me that *I* was somehow turning the energy I was
receiving into these entities, and that I needed to find out how I was
"feeding" these phenomena.

After my conference with the Big Cheese from New York, I went into a
mild panic. I felt very isolated.

I broke off contact with the Gurdjieff organization and stopped “sitting.” My experiences were too real to write off.

And the fact that I had been fine until I started this meditation was just too much of a coincidence.

However, I did see a psychiatrist right away. He told me that I was
the victim of hypnosis, but prescribed anti-psychotic drugs (Risperdal)
for me. A few weeks later, I became so upset at my continued
harrassment by these "entities", and at the collapse of my trust in the
Gurdjieff work, that I had to leave work and go on disability.

I moved back home, in another state. The psychiatrist I saw there told me, after four or five sessions, that he didn't think I was psychotic,
because I didn't evidence any thought disorder or other signs that would
accompany, say, schizophrenia.

This man, though a Moslem (which I'm just guessing, because his name was Mohammed), said to me at our last appointment, "This might sound stupid, but you should consider seeing a Catholic priest for an exorcism."

My third and current psychiatrist told me I have schizoaffective disorder. So much for psychiatry.

I don’t believe that these visitations are the product of psychosis,
but the resulting depression and anxiety have required psychiatric
care. I take my medications, but it’s just to “cover my bets.”

Eventually, by the end of February, I stopped feeling the hands.
But I still feel, almost every night when I go to bed, something walking
around on my bed. (I used to be able to feel both my little friends and
the creatures approaching me when I sat on the bed – I felt the mattress
being pressed down, although I never *saw* it go down.)

Also, the energy stopped flowing by March. However, I still feel a constant movement and pulsing at the top of my head. It simply will not go away. After some research, I realized that this was my "crown chakra."

I need to mention a few stray facts. First, my group leader twice
demonstrated her powers of telekinesis to me, by turning my head to one
side. It felt like a force moving my head (not like hands).

Second, once during a very heavy period of energy flow through my body, I went into a bodily ecstasy: I was swept out of my body, through the top of my head. I kept my eyes closed the whole time, so I don't know what I would have seen had I opened them. However, I experienced the complete loss of the sensation of having a body, plus an experience of existing briefly in a world of lights, some of different colors.

One more thing I should mention. This is the only experience whose
"supernatural" origin I’m unsure about. One afternoon in December,
during the thick of things, I was home and decided to open my blinds to
let the sun in. I usually keep them down.

After awhile, I noticed across the courtyard of my apartment building a man standing there, perfectly straight, and staring directly at me into my apartment across the courtyard. He was in his 30’s, bearded, and wore a poncho (who wears ponchos these days? ? ).

All I can say is, you had to be there. His stare went right through me.

At first I tried to ignore it. Finally, I approached my window. At that point, this gentleman turned to his right like a robot, and robotically walked away. I never saw him before and I haven’t seen him since. I’m not sure what to make of this experience. My current theory is that either he was some kind of possessed person sent to “greet” me, or he was an apparition.

My tentative conclusions about all this is that, as the
spiritualists teach, there are "entities from the lower astral realm"
who like to interfere with people on occasion.

The energy phenomena I was dealing with attracted them. (By the way, things got worse and worse at actual meetings. For instance, while "sitting," I would feel my little friends approach me. Once they put two hands on my head, sort of like the "laying on of hands" done by Christians. Another time, one came up, grabbed my toes, and shook them. Mostly mischievous stuff.)

As I described it to my sister, I felt like a deaf, blind, retarded
person stuck in a classroom full of obnoxious 8th graders. In other
words, the entities were more childish than what I would call "evil."
But they were most definitely annoying.

I've decided that my spiritual path should avoid any kind of work
with "energies."

Happily, I came across non-dual teachings (e.g., Advaita Vedanta, Dzogchen, etc.), and their contemporary exponents, and
these seem to me, at my deepest core, to be true.

Comments are appreciated. I hope I've entertained you, if not
enlightened you. Please reply to the newsgroup.



[groups.google.com]



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 08/08/2008 10:49PM by corboy.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Gurdjieff
Posted by: cber7 ()
Date: August 09, 2008 12:45AM

Quote
bill77
One more thought on the subject.....
…If you are a Christian, your visions follow a certain pattern; if you are a
Hindu, a Buddhist, or a Muslim, they follow a different pattern. You see Christ
or Krishna, according to your conditioning; your education, the culture in which
you have been brought up, determines your visions. Which is the actuality: the
vision, or the mind which has been shaped in a certain mold? The vision is the
projection of the particular tradition which happens to form the background of
the mind. This conditioning, not the vision which it projects, is the actuality,
the fact. To understand the fact is simple; but it is made difficult by our
likes and dislikes, by our condemnation of the fact, by the opinions or
judgments we have about the fact. To be free of these various forms of
evaluation is to understand the actual, the what is.


this is getting more interesting. now you've infused an element of kant and hegel. you are making gurdjieff into something less than the original thinker he claimed to be. is there anything new under the sun?

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Gurdjieff
Posted by: corboy ()
Date: August 09, 2008 07:37AM

Quote
cber7 said:
is there anything new under the sun?

Apparently not.

If you want an overview of G's sources, get and read James Webb's book, 'The Harmonious Circle.'

Webb meticulously traced the origin of everything G taught. The fellow had utilized many, many sources from spiritualist and theosophical literature and it was available in quantity in late 19th century/early 20th century Russia--occultism and spiritualism and theosophy were all the rage.

And for the larger social milieu in which G moved, get and read James Moore's book, Madame Blavatsky's Baboon, and In Search of PD Ouspensky by Gary Lachman.

Lachman notes that the physical tasks set by Gurdy would've been novel, even something close to shock therapy, because most of the Russian disciples had never done housework in thier lives--they'd had servants.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Gurdjieff
Posted by: bill77 ()
Date: August 09, 2008 09:02AM

James Moore wrote the definitive biography of G. "Anatomy of a Myth".
It might be of interest to note that James Webb was not involved with the Gurdjieff work.
Strangely, he committed suicide after the publication of the Gurdjieff book.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Gurdjieff
Posted by: corboy ()
Date: August 09, 2008 10:44PM

Webb's suicide does not compromise the quality of his scholarship, which was formidable.

Gurdjieffians have an ugly habit of suggesting that people who question the work or leave the work, will come to a bad end.

Namely that they will die like dogs, etc.

A great way to scare people into remaining in work groups--eh?

Dont question the work, or you will end up as Mr Webb did?

Not so.

Plenty have left Fourth Way work and are grateful that they did.

Go read the comments on [www.esotericfreedom.blogspot.com]

And.. note that that discussion has also been troubled by trolls.

In his introduction to The Harmonioius Circle, Webb made it very clear that he wished to remain outside of Gurdjieff work precisely so he could write about it objectively, as a scholar should. He had a feeling that some who did try to offer him assistance were trying to co-opt him into the work, and that was a division of loyalties he was determined to avoid.

The introduction to his work is worth re-visiting. Webb was frank about what he could not see. He had wished very much to see the Sacred Dances performed, either in person or on film but was unable to do so. He makes that very clear. Had he been willing to fake it and sneak into Fourth Way, he could possibly have witnessed these more sensitive parts of the Work, but he played an honest game of it--and in doing so respected the privacy of the practitioners.

Gary Lachman did Fourth Way work for awhile and later on left it. He ended up being far more intrigued by Ouspensky and in his book, In Search of PD Ouspensky, came to the conclusion that Ouspensky had been a remarkable and highly productive person before meeting Gurdjieff. Lachman's personal take was that O's later career was sadly derailed and saddest of all, Ouspensky had started as a gentle and intuitive man, and allowed G to batter him until he adopted a persona that was harsh, tough, alien to him.

That is Lachman's assessment...and Lachman had, from his own report, done some Fourth Way stuff.

As for what afflicted Webb there have been some viable suggestions that he could well have suffered from bipolar affective disorder. Sufferers can be astoundingly creative and productive, but pay the price when catastrophic depressions set in. Webb died in 1980, when the disorder was less well understood and fewer effective drugs were available.

People do not commit suicide does not happen just because theyve studied and demystified the career of a famous opportunist, as James Webb did, when he wrote and published Harmonious Circle.

Claiming or insinuating that his suicide was causally connected to his work woudlve been a great way for persons to smear him, while keeping mum that they were displeased by his book.

For Fourth Way people to state publicly that they didnt like Webbs findings would have dropped clues to the general public that Webb had
hit them in a tender spot..a clue that he was 'on to something.'

So...much cleverer to keep quiet about his book...and rub it in about his suicide.

Ive read and heard suggestions that what led Mr Webb to kill himself was bipolar affective disorder, a medical psychiatric condition with a strong hereditary propensity. In other words, it runs in families. Its treatment is a combination of lifestyle adjustments and medication, tailored to the needs of the individual, much like what is done for persons with diabetes.

Bipolar can co-exist with intellectual acuity and artistic talent. Energy levels and work output can be stunning and of the highest quality, when one is 'high.' But the price is paid later when the sufferer incurs neurotransmitter depletion and crashes into depression.

Even today, 28 years after Webb died, bipolar has a substantial mortality rate, because adhering to the necessary medication and lifestyle changes is difficult for many persons.



The real religion in the Fourth Way is not truth, its authoritarian power.

Whoever has power is automatically in the right, just as Mommy and Daddy are always right, even when beating the kids.

Fourth Way is a version of Daddy and Mommy are always right, no matter how they behave.



Edited 4 time(s). Last edit at 08/09/2008 11:04PM by corboy.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Gurdjieff
Posted by: bill77 ()
Date: August 09, 2008 10:52PM

corboy, a very interesting response to the listing of the facts of the situation.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 08/09/2008 11:01PM by rrmoderator.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Gurdjieff
Posted by: Keir ()
Date: August 10, 2008 10:25PM

Thanks Corboy. Very interesting.



Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 08/10/2008 10:31PM by Keir.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Gurdjieff
Posted by: corboy ()
Date: August 10, 2008 11:11PM

A man who was in quite a different group (Ancient and Mystical Order of the Rosicrucians) describes a process of self induced trance that he
learned to practice by following the prescribed rituals at home.

In the trance, the reading material from the group seemed much more credible and convincing.

A similar process may happen if one heavily practices various and sundry Fourth Way exercises (whether its derived from G or considered bogus is irrelevant. As mentioned above, Ouspenksy, in his book, In Search of the Miraculous, described a major episode of dissociative amnesia while practicing self remembering--from instructions given by G himself. So if the true source provided homework exercises that could trigger trance, that means its irrelevant whether one's teacher was originally G or a fake spin off.

If these fourth way homework exercies are capable of triggering self induced trance, one will enter a state of mind in which one becomes capable of 'believing as many as six impossible things before breakfast'

For it is well understood that in hypnosis, logical inconsistencies are ignored or accepted, but would be noticed and arouse concern if that same subject were not in trance.

One cannot do objective scholarship as Webb chose to do, if one 'does the Work' and then gets into trance.

Those in trance and those who refuse to share trance with them can never agree on anything.

What is interesting is that according to Pierre Freeman, author of The Prisoner of San Jose, the prescribed practices had to be done in secret and took up a great deal of time.

The promises of the AMORC group sound similar to G work:

"For many, many decades, the Ancient and Mystic Order of Rosae Crucis had been soliciting members through ads promising potential membership in a secret society graced by distinguished historical figures such as Sir Isaac Newton, Francis Bacon and Benjamin Franklin.

The secrets of the ages were offered to the masses in strange but alluring ads that spoke of invisible worlds, astral projection, attunement with Cosmic Consciousness, gifts of illumination bestowed abundantly on its true initiates."

"CHAPTER VII- FIRST INITIATION……………………………………………….PAGE 119

In this chapter, Freeman reviews some of the early monographs and begins to point out the theoretical beliefs that underlie the Rosicrucian affirmations of their elite superiority to the rest of mankind. Rituals and spiritual practices, which separate them from the rest of mankind, are a part of this program of establishing a separate identity. Through the ritual practices at home, which Freeman believes creates a hypnotically-enhanced state of suggestibility, enhancing the power of the monographs in the mind of the initiate. Freeman talks about the case AMORC makes for the infallibility of the teachings and how the long-term member becomes increasingly reluctant to question the teaching in any serious way."

He was also led to fear misfortune if he left the group.

"CHAPTER XII- ROSICRUCIAN ADVENTURES IN THE BIG APPLE ……..PAGE 235

Leaving Miami in 1987, Freeman winds up in New York, driving a gypsy cab. He finds out that his mother, back in Haiti, is dying of cancer- and tries to heal her remotely. At some point, distressed with his lack of success in life, he resigns from AMORC. But a few days later, his desultory cab driving works against him again and he winds up homeless in New York, sleeping on a bench in Eastern Parkway, Brooklyn. Facing this new reality, he decides this new level of homelessness is a result of his resignation from AMORC and he rejoins again. Later, he will find out he is a victim of “phobia indoctrination,” fears that have been instilled in him about the dire consequences of leaving the cult. "

[bookflash.com]

Just as many argue that the US doesnt use torture, because sleep deprivation and waterboarding do not resemble our stereotyped views of what constitutes torture, it can be very hard to believe that mind control can be accomplished by remote control, not via direct coercion at gunpoint or in a jungle compound.

One tends to assume that mind control is only possible in a group or 'hands on' situation, especially one that is coercive.

Sometimes comparing two different groups and identifying similar trends can empower and deepen our insight and acuity.

For those of us on this thread, it might be an interesting extension of our collective effort at continuing education to look at a first person account by Pierre Freeman, who was a 24 member of a totally different group.

Yet..Freeman describes becoming entranced via methods of self induction that he practiced at home--and reinforced at home. Freeman described a very time consuming and standardized ritual.

But it may be that even if one is encouraged to create one's own original ritual or set of images, those too could become part of a process of ongoing trance induction (similar to what was reported by disillusioned former members of Transcendental Meditation).

Especially if one is instructed to keep these rituals secret. In Freeman's case, he was financially insecure and periodically homeless and estranged from his family for the 24 years he was involved with AMORC.

More Quotes

Quote:
From 'The Prisoner of San Jose'
Freeman describes how by creating a home sanctum, something like a tiny temple in your home, using candles and incense while visualizing certain symbols and making certain symbolic gestures, you quickly become hypnotized, a state which enhances your suggestibility and hence the believability of the Rosicrucian claims. The monographs, those weekly lessons, are read religiously in this artificial atmosphere, heightening their effect and altering your personality to be like those compliant souls who have been subjected to the ritual hypnosis of so many cult groups.
“When you receive their weekly lessons, called monographs, you become enthralled with the possibilities. After a short period of time practicing their techniques of visualization and mind control, you come to believe that you have finally discovered what makes the world tick. The problem is that you really have no evidence of that reality, just the continual restatement of that claim.

What has happened is that your personality has been altered by subtle but carefully orchestrated techniques of hypnosis.

[bookflash.com]”


Quote:
And
Freeman's experiences with the Rosy Cross (illuminated by many excerpts from the diary he kept during his 24-year mental captivity) will have become a powerful lens for seeing how the aims and strategies of remote indoctrination, which date back to the beginnings of recorded time, are everywhere woven into the fabric of the modern world. His modest account dizzies the imagination by the way it extends our understanding of the term "cult," [bookflash.com]

In a Q&A interview, Freeman commented (in just a small exerpt--read the whole thing)


Quote:
How do the techniques of AMORC differ from most religious cults? What is Remote Indoctrination?
AMORC has various Lodges, where members meet, throughout the world. Still, I doubt whether most members attend them regularly. The essence of AMORC’s grip on its disciples, in my opinion, is a correspondence course coupled with certain so-called spiritual exercises, which is at the core of the course.

Religious cults, in general, are very hand-on. Group activities serve initially to fatigue and brainwash the new member. There is very heavy person-to-person influence involved and lots of activities and work to quickly cement the disciple in his affiliation.

AMORC uses another methodology, which I call Remote Indoctrination. Their form of Remote Indoctrination relies on using powerful authoritarian claims, rooted in the various lessons, called Monographs, combined with hypnotic techniques and phobia inducing claims.

I have a 16 Article, somewhat sarcastic, Declaration of Remote Indoctrination, in my book, which describes in detail what is necessary to accomplish this process; namely, brainwashing without a prison cell or powerful group meetings with a charismatic leadership.

It’s quite amazing to experience, but very, very hard to understand if one’s caught up to it. You become a Mind Slave of an external organization without even realizing it.


and (sound familiar, anyone?)


Quote:
Why do you think you were forced into poverty and homelessness because of the Order?
If you study the monographs like I did, you begin to see a kind of dualism in them.

On the one hand, they portray membership in the Order as rather easy, involving only a few hours a week of study.

(Corboy's note: It is common for groups to say, 'Oh, just take what you like and leave the rest.' Or 'Just give it a taste')

But if you look carefully, you see something else- a kind of covert agenda, which only the truly serious and faithful student will pick up.

This agenda promises success only to those who truly practice the exercises rigorously and often and continually to review and reread the monographs.

The true adept will be constantly praying and meditating in his home sanctum; adopting a special breathing protocol which he will be constantly practicing, adopting a special posture for sleeping; constantly trying to visualize his goals and see auras- until he achieves his goals.

But since the goals, in my opinion, are simply unachievable due to the deficiency of the teaching, he (the ardent practitioner C) will undertake a course of action that will dominate and control his life.


Quote:
You claim that AMORC uses hypnosis on its subjects. Since most of the Rosicrucian members practice at home, how can this possibly happen?
Many experts in Mind Control speak about the way a trance can be induced covertly.

Prayer and meditation which may in certain contexts be valuable religious exercised, used to commune with one’s Deity, can also serve to bring the mind into a state of hypnosis.

The difference between meditation used for a spiritual reason and for a mind control reason is the intention.

In our case, we would be told to read about the authoritarian claims of AMORC at a time of suggestibility which was heightened by candles, incense, certain spiritual postures and rituals and chanting

. I believe these practices made the incredible claims of AMORC much more credible, eventually working deeply in the personality of the member and transforming him into an unconscious servant of the Order.


And..what makes it very difficult to convey these insights is that most of us cant stand to face that we are human and therefore vulnerable/influenceable. We so want to believe and have been socialized to regard ourselves as invulnerable, hard shelled atoms, impervious to outside influence, flattering ourselves 'It could never happen to me, I'd never be so weak.'

Buy into that, and you're far more vulnerable than someone who knows that as humans and social animals our glory and our danger is prescisely that we can be influenced, given the right set of circumstances.

And that because we are in relationships, we, and people we care about are going to get old, get sick, and die--and that means from time to time, we are going to feel lonesome and heartbroken.

Or, have plenty of reason to worry about financial welfare.

Freeman had all of that going on, and sought through AMORC to become master of his fate.

And is now trying to tell us what he learned about remote controlled trance induction.


Quote:
What role does hypnosis play in AMORC? How are their practices of meditation and prayer related to hypnosis?
I think hypnosis, in the form of self-hypnosis, plays a subtle but powerful role in AMORC, particularly in the prescribed times in the Home Sanctum. Trance is induced in various ways and a message driven in by the authoritarian, monolithic authority of the monographs. Both meditation and prayer involve an opening up of the mind to Divinity, to higher authority. If that concept is twisted in the right way, these spiritual tools can be used to condition the mind to specific objectives by the human authority that controls the mind of the meditator or petitioner. Instead of creating spiritual communion, these tools will heighten suggestibility.
[bookflash.com]



Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 08/10/2008 11:23PM by corboy.

Options: ReplyQuote
Current Page: 3 of 4


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
This forum powered by Phorum.