Quote
zelig
[b:287894acd6]The whole guru business is a racket. It's a moot point about whether Siddha was considered bonafide or not by ACB. Both of their philosophies play out very badly for western followers and their children. They are both [u:287894acd6][i:287894acd6]cults[/i:287894acd6][/u:287894acd6], bearing the full weight and meaning that word implies.[/b:287894acd6]
I totally agree with you.
My reason for looking into this aspect of it is that it is a carefully constructed racket which is in need of serious deconstruction. To paraphrase it is all crap, as true and as much easier as this would be, is not taken as being very convincing or thought provoking by the people who could benefit from listening.
A shortage of information on the background/evolution of Siddha and SOI in the hands of those who want to discredit him for the exact reason that, as you say, the philosophies play out very badly, allows us to be too easily dismissed as just disgruntled demons with too much time on our hands.
I am well aware that there are many ACB apologists who have populated the way of thinking that he was without fault and it is merely modern ISKCON (following his death) that has strayed from the path of the absolute truth. This manner of thinking has worked very well to Siddha's advantage in building his own empire. The vast majority of his followers that I have met have a reverence for ACB and fear and/or contempt of ISKCON based on the perception which has been imparted on them by Siddha.
Really from a point of logic it is only possible to conclude, by the contradictions which abound between Siddha and ACB, that either Siddha is wrong, which of course his followers are very reluctant (to say the least) to accept, that ACB was wrong, which would leave Siddha without a spiritual master and therefore have to invalidate him by the KC philosophy, although I doubt anyone who considers themselves a devotee would choose anyone over ACB, or that they are both wrong.
Personally my opinion is that the whole damn thing is a huge hoax. I just want to be able to prove it, or at the very least promote it in a well written and thoroughly researched manner to promote thinking on the subject - and hopefully prevent the damage these cults cause in even just a few lives.
My own idea when I was in the cult having spent a lot of time before getting inolved studying ACB's writings and some of the background of ISKCON was very much that I needed to find a genuine spiritual master. One really has to dig quite deeply and there is a shortage of work which is very revealing or ciritical of ACB, which is quite a suprise to me considering the amount of evidence that he was hardly the innocent unaware bystander of abuse and corruption that he has been sanctified as.
The fact that Siddha (and there are several others) was an initiated disciple who had split from the corrupt movement gave him a convincing air of credibility to me. I don't think that I am the only one that has been or could be taken in by the same notion.