Re: "Jesus Christians," "Australian cult," Dave McKay
Date: August 08, 2011 10:50PM
It will be Reinhart who is responsible, unfortunately, if anyone ever thinks to investigate. It is his responsibility, as an adult, to observe the terms of his compensation payout, and the court is unlikley to accept a passing of the buck to the Apostle, although the cash was most likely passed rapidly to him.
The Apostle, doubtless, is aware of this. He is not a scheming, devious, wanker extraordinaire for nothing.
Yes!...I can think of an incident where a certain object was stolen from Deakin University and donated to India (no doubt quietly sanctioned by Mckay) and then the "perpetrators"(ex members at that point) were revealed by McKay....or how in my day, illegally accepting unemployment benefits (as we had no intention of ever looking for work other than flogging off McKays' tracts) was a financial policy, first suggested by McKay ("Spoiling Eygpt" ...the COG doctrine)...and then later duplicitously denied....whoever can be "used" will be.
(The Equitable(at law) doctrine of "Undue Influence" needs to be reinterpreted such that "pacts" and "collusion" in crime,
can be read in such a manner to finger the snivelling McKay....and other "Fagins" of cultic incline, rather than simply collar poor Oliver Twist!)