Apologies if there has been reference made to this before, it's new to me and I'm new to this forum.
The Global Ideas Bank has a nifty little list of questions to establish a leader's "Guru Quotient". Here are some of the results:
- Bhagwan (Osho) 17 (out of 100);
- Maharishi 23;
- Leonard Orr of the Rebirthing movement 53;
- Swami Bhaktivedanta of the Hare Krishna movement 60;
- Krishnamurti 73;
- Stephen Gaskin (from the Tennessee farm commune) 77.
Surprise surprise, there are objections to the nature of the questions from the lowes scorer. Of course, David McKay will probably make similar objections.
For those unfamiliar with Stephen Gaskin and the Farm community:
[
en.wikipedia.org]
The questions run thus:
(1) Is what the guru offers free?
(2) Is the guru relatively poor? - ie not having personal control (or control in practice) over more wealth than is needed for him or her to live in normal comfort and dignity?
(3) Is it unnecessary to join the organisation in order to have access to the teachings (are there books, tapes, open meetings, etc that transmit the knowledge needed)?
(4) Is it easy to leave the guru; are ex-disciples treated satisfactorily; and are 'opponents' of the guru treated fairly?
(5) Does the guru refrain from sexual involvement with the disciples?
(6) Is free contact allowed with families and friends?
(7) Is there respect for quality in the work of the guru's organisation (no ugly architecture for instance)?
(8) Are the guru's words in harmony with past spiritual insights, such as contained in Huxley's 'Perennial Philosophy' anthology?
(9) Is the organisation non-authoritarian - are there signs of democracy, for instance, or of questioning and debate and thinking for oneself being welcomed?
(10) Is the guru's legitimacy anchored in a tradition that points back to previous gurus, rather than the guru claiming to be the sole arbiter of his or her legitimacy?
(11) Does the guru avoid claiming to be a perfect master, offering the only route to enlightenment? Is he open about his own 'feet of clay', if he has them?
(12) Does the guru recognise that his or her authority is 'phase-specific', eg lasting only long enough to bring you up to his or her level of understanding?
(13) Does the guru's organisation, in its methods and in all aspects of its daily regime, successfully avoid psychologically coercive or brainwashing-style techniques?
(14) Do the guru's or organisation's replies to these questions agree with evidence from other sources? - for instance, ask the Cult Information Centre for their perspective (Ian Haworth, BCM Cults, London WC1N 3XX, tel 020 8651 3322).
(15) Does the guru have less than 1,000 signed-up disciples? (Gurus with large followings seem to be more prone to succumb to the temptations of power.)
Here's the link to the site this is from:
[
www.globalideasbank.org]#
Have fun working out David McKay's "Guru Quotient"!