Quote
yasmin
Just a quick comment on a post [b:afda3fc251]Fran [/b:afda3fc251]made on the JC forum,saying that the people on the Rick Ross forum were only worried about private information posted on ex members and had de humanized current members and taken away their rights:
Pease re-read the posts.
Actually a lot of people: Hello, Apostate, Jack Oscar Lam, me, in various ways supported anonymity for current as well as ex members.(My main plea was actually for a current JC child to have anonymity).
And Mr Ross stated no information on current members would be published.
Out of interest, would you have done as much for us?
Shame on Fran. I wonder where she learned to twist the truth like a gutter journalist.
Although I stated I didn't want any names publish here (current members or ex-members), I do have personal concerns for some ex-members.
I think the point that current members feed off publicity makes them easy prey, but ex-members, by and large, choose to remain anonymous - especially here at this forum, where fair moderation protects identity and the curbs the need for slanderous outbursts. Couldn't say that about the [i:afda3fc251]Dave's Club [/i:afda3fc251]website - [
www.welikejesus.com]
In summary, it's all in black and white and there's no real need for me to defend myself.
Shame on you, Fran!