dpa10 it really is becoming increasingly obvious that your purpose in posting on this board only to apologize for the "cult" like groups you have been involved in.
So far you have defended EST, Landmark, Sterling and TM.
All these groups are listed at the Ross Institute database with large archives of bad press, complaints etc.
Interesting how you just reverted once again to a personal attack as soon as you were put in the position to be exposed as an apologist.
Correction: The lawsuit you mention did not result in a $7.5 million dollar loss for me and it was settled in 1996, essentially for more of my professional time and $5,000.00
See [
www.culteducation.com]
The plaintiff told CBS "60 Minutes" and the Washington Post he was used by Scientology. We are now friendly and he left the "cult."
However, bringing this up has nothing to do with Sterling or the fact that he has a video of you naked on his shelf.
The point is Sterling has a destructive history and does not inform people what they are really getting into when they sign off on his paperwork.
Later when the men strip naked, as you once did, they realize what they signed away through the paperwork.
This is similar to Landmark requiring participants to sign an advance agreement that limits their legal recourse to binding arbritration.
Both groups don't fully inform people before entering weekend programs exactly what they are submitting themselves to and signing off on in meaningful detail.
Your reaction to all this is very telling.