Current Page: 2 of 4
Been vs. Weed and Landmark case activity
Posted by: ajinajan ()
Date: February 08, 2007 03:50PM

Quote
joe6
Due to the ruling on Jan. 18, the case has been transferred back to Tulsa county. New case page:
[www.oscn.net]

No date set for the trial yet.

Did not catch that one...

Thanks for the update.

Options: ReplyQuote
Been vs. Weed and Landmark case activity
Posted by: ajinajan ()
Date: February 09, 2007 04:45AM

Starting to get some interesting press:

[b:391bc63266]Woman sues alleged killer, company on behalf of son's estate[/b:391bc63266]
KSWO, OK
[www.kswo.com]

[b:391bc63266]KFDA[/b:391bc63266]
[www.newschannel10.com]

also at
[b:391bc63266]KTEN, TX [/b:391bc63266]
[www.kten.com]

[b:391bc63266] Mother of slain mailman sues alleged killer, company[/b:391bc63266]
Bartlesville Examiner Enterprise, OK - Feb 7, 2007
[www.examiner-enterprise.com]

Options: ReplyQuote
Been vs. Weed and Landmark case activity
Posted by: ajinajan ()
Date: February 09, 2007 01:49PM

Quote
ajinajan
Starting to get some interesting press:

[b:4d3f372c70]Woman sues alleged killer, company on behalf of son's estate[/b:4d3f372c70]
KSWO, OK
[www.kswo.com]

[b:4d3f372c70]KFDA[/b:4d3f372c70]
[www.newschannel10.com]

also at
[b:4d3f372c70]KTEN, TX [/b:4d3f372c70]
[www.kten.com]

[b:4d3f372c70] Mother of slain mailman sues alleged killer, company[/b:4d3f372c70]
Bartlesville Examiner Enterprise, OK - Feb 7, 2007
[www.examiner-enterprise.com]

Slain man's mom suing accused
By BILL BRAUN World Staff Writer
2/7/2007
She's also suing a company that she says contributed to the alleged killer's insanity.
[www.tulsaworld.com]

Options: ReplyQuote
Been vs. Weed and Landmark case activity
Posted by: ON2 LF ()
Date: February 09, 2007 04:03PM

should be very interesting to see how LE worms its way out of this. They'll have to get creative, and no doubt they will. I hope the lawyers working for the mom win the case for her. More than the crime of murder has been committed if they don't.

Options: ReplyQuote
Been vs. Weed and Landmark case activity
Posted by: anon-aclu-member ()
Date: March 02, 2007 06:27AM

This case has moved jurisdictions at the request of Landmark Education Corporation.

It was Oklahoma County No. CJ-2006-5200.

It is now Tulsa County No. CJ-2007-818.

The above links allow the real-time tracking of status through The Oklahoma State Courts Network.

Options: ReplyQuote
Been vs. Weed and Landmark case activity
Posted by: anon-aclu-member ()
Date: March 02, 2007 07:37AM

joe6 - so sorry.

You'd already posted the new link weeks ago and I got confused on the page layout and missed it. My bad. :)

Options: ReplyQuote
Been vs. Weed and Landmark case activity
Posted by: ON2 LF ()
Date: March 02, 2007 08:53AM

so, by changing county they get to change judges too?

Options: ReplyQuote
Been vs. Weed and Landmark case activity
Posted by: ajinajan ()
Date: March 02, 2007 09:22AM

Quote
anon-aclu-member
This case has moved jurisdictions at the request of Landmark Education Corporation.

It was Oklahoma County No. CJ-2006-5200.

It is now Tulsa County No. CJ-2007-818.

The above links allow the real-time tracking of status through The Oklahoma State Courts Network.

Sure looks that way, new judge, and everything gets refiled...

Options: ReplyQuote
Been vs. Weed and Landmark case activity
Posted by: ON2 LF ()
Date: March 02, 2007 02:28PM

I didn't realize legal maneuvering could involve geography.

Options: ReplyQuote
Been vs. Weed and Landmark case activity
Posted by: patrick-darcy ()
Date: March 03, 2007 09:30AM

keep us posted.

it is interesting to see that landmark wanted
to move the case and has had it done.

i understand why lawyers move cases but
i am wondering as to the particulars of what
landmark said to get it accomplished.

Options: ReplyQuote
Current Page: 2 of 4


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
This forum powered by Phorum.