rrmoderator wrote:

Of course a study done by an LGAT by itself internally would not be objective and I didn't mean that.

Let me clarify this.

"No LGAT, that I aware of, has ever gone through the process of commissioning/funding a study to be done by an independent researcher, peer reviewed and then published by a reputable journal, which focused on objectively measurable results.

Landmark has done polling to rate customer satisfaction, opinions etc. which is subjective and does not match such a process."

Agreed,

"HAI may have the money to fund such research.

"This is something you actually don't know, per your previous comments."

While I have never seen written documentation of HAI's financial status, I have no reason to doubt the veracity of Janet Dale's informal reports of that status at Intern Workshops. Her reports indicate that HAI's profits are small and that in some lean years they are negative.

Bert Clanton:

You admit. "I have never seen written documentation of HAI's financial status..."

End of discussion on this point.

You know nothing other than whatever you are told.

rrmoderator wrote:

"Bert Clanton:

You admit. "I have never seen written documentation of HAI's financial status..."

End of discussion on this point.

You know nothing other than whatever you are told."

End of discussion on *all* points.

[...]

I don't expect to see this message in the Forum.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 09/03/2009 08:54AM by rrmoderator.

Bert Clanton:

OK.

HAI has reportedly become a not-for-profit organisation with the status of a charity. It still charges high rates for its weekend workshops. Since it is a charity its finances should be available for public inspection. Maybe someone can upload some details here. ST.