Quote
joe6
This is one of the many bad effects EST/LE has had on people, which goes to my question on how to talk to my friend who has been involved since the Werner days.
He thinks of himself as an ethical "good person". So how does someone who's been involved for so long ever come around to seeing Landmark for what it really is,
because you would have to think about all the people that you helped Landmark abuse, which may be too much for my friend's "nice guy" brain. How does someone get from here to there in realizing what they've helped do to people?
I have learned you can't talk to them. I agree with nutrino, that if you're going to do anything at all, you have to show them.
Their former defense mechanisms are dismantled in the Forum, and they are systematically programmed with new LEC-friendly defenses. Things are switched now, however, and the abuser is on the inside, protected against reason and critical thinking. Landmark's first commandment, "Give up being right, even when you know you are" comes from the primal sin of making someone wrong.
From what I have seen in my ex-gf, that is the core of the defense. In the last conversation we had before we called it quits, I asked her if she was open to the possibility she had been manipulated, that she was wrong. I explained that two possibilities exist about my view of Landmark. I could be right, and it is manipulative, or I could be wrong. I said I viewed the probability of my being wrong was infinitesimally small, but there was a chance. She would not even acknowledge that there was a possibility that she was wrong. Not just zero probability; that possibility did not even exist. She could not say: I COULD BE WRONG. How narcissitic, infantile-omniscient is that? They get to define which possibilities exist and which do not. How convenient is that? For all their talk of giving up being right, being right and only right (and that you are wrong and only wrong) is their defense. You cannot talk to someone who believes that they are infallible.
The histoical stories (I say it that way because of LEC's damnable hijacking of useful words) people have shared here seem to indicate that one of the first steps in getting out is realizing that they may be wrong about their LGAT, or that they have been lied to/manipulated. Once truly open to that, then they can start to hear.
Add in the weight of the consequence of being wrong -- that you have harmed others -- and the retreat into "I have to be right" surely must get deeper. People have committed suicide for less.
-lightwolf