Current Page: 1 of 12
Results 1 - 30 of 336
15 days ago
ThePetitor
There have been two very interesting stories in the press recently. Just yesterday, it was revealed that three former senior staff at the hospital where nurse Lucy Letby murdered seven babies and attempted to kill seven others have been arrested on suspicion of gross negligence manslaughter. The BBC report on the arrests goes on to say: QuoteBBC report on arrest of senior leaders (continued
Forum: Destructive Churches
15 days ago
ThePetitor
Test message - please ignore (I am having trouble uploading a post so just checking to see if a simple message works!)
Forum: Destructive Churches
4 weeks ago
ThePetitor
Some of you may recall that one or two people mentioned the Keswick Convention a few pages back. This is a hugely respected convention that has been going on for 150 years and, putting their faith into action, has never charged one penny for all the conference activities including speakers with a global reputation (some of whom are authors of books many of you have read), seminars, children’s and
Forum: Destructive Churches
5 weeks ago
ThePetitor
Mirmac and Syderhunter, welcome to the forum. There seem to have been few folks join us recently and it can at times be hard to keep up with all the new contributors. Sorry if I have missed any. To be honest, I have not commented a great deal as I struggle to follow some of the more recent posts. I think you perhaps have to know a fair bit about different individuals before it is easy to
Forum: Destructive Churches
6 weeks ago
ThePetitor
I was reading Titus this morning and came across the following: QuoteTitus 1v6 An elder must be blameless, faithful to his wife, a man whose children believe and are not open to the charge of being wild and disobedient I was just wondering about the last part of that, the expectation that the children of leaders should at least show respect for their parents and the path they tread. We ob
Forum: Destructive Churches
2 months ago
ThePetitor
Welcome Anonanon, it is good to have you join us. I hope you will hang about and keep up to date with all that is happening even if you do not particularly engage in ongoing commentary. As for your comments on the school, a slightly bizarre thought struck me. We all know that Struthers is largely based on bullying, whether it be from the pulpit, in private conversations, in the school or eve
Forum: Destructive Churches
2 months ago
ThePetitor
BigJacque, welcome to the forum. I note you say that "90% of your stories are nothing but cap, empty lies that crumble under scrutiny". Am I right in thinking the word 'cap' is used as, "a slang term that originated in the United States and is commonly used in African American Vernacular English (AAVE)"? It is not a word I have seen used in this way before. A
Forum: Destructive Churches
2 months ago
ThePetitor
Like many others, I have been a bit overwhelmed by all the activity recently. It is hard to keep up with all the posts, and I do not even make the attempt to work out who might be who or, who might be referring to whom. There are some points I have noted however. Going all the way back to the letters Pauline wrote, Rensil said: QuoteRensil on p235 I’d say that Pauline has shown great cour
Forum: Destructive Churches
2 months ago
ThePetitor
RedRoad - and what about: Rolled away Rolled away And the button of my hat rolled away.
Forum: Destructive Churches
2 months ago
ThePetitor
Silentfornow, I am so sorry that you have had a bad experience of this forum and that you feel it is no longer a safe place. I have not read over the posts again, and often do not follow the complexities of who said what to whom, so am not at this point thinking of the detail, but it really is not right for people to be identified and their lives discussed on a public forum in that way. Sorr
Forum: Destructive Churches
3 months ago
ThePetitor
I was looking back at the first few pages of this forum and found it made interesting reading. In those early days, one defender of Struthers (anon201062) did try to make some rational arguments in favour of Struthers but inevitably tied themselves in knots trying to defend the confused chaos that is Struthers doctrine. There were some good discussions though and it is a shame they did not cont
Forum: Destructive Churches
3 months ago
ThePetitor
Welcome Shug_the_pig, West_of_Scotland and Extra. It is always good to have new contributors. QuoteQuote on this forum These older boys basically waterboarded us ‘in the name of the lord’. (I have on this occasion deliberately omitted the author as "justice should be blind" - it should don't matter who said this!) Is no leader – current or past – going to investigate t
Forum: Destructive Churches
3 months ago
ThePetitor
QuoteMulberry p237 Being privy to some inside information i can confirm that the leadership in SMC are now describing Pauline Anderson and Allen Martin as "very troublesome and misguided". They are now seen as usurpers and Offenders of the "Faith." Now there's a surprise! Note the NOW describing. This would tie in with TheGreek’s earlier post: QuoteTheGreek p236 A
Forum: Destructive Churches
3 months ago
ThePetitor
On another note, Mulberry, I hear your criticism of Pauline, and am sure that is justified. She absolutely should be asking herself whether there are things she should be apologising for. That does not take away from any questions that are being raised however. As I said quite recently: QuoteThePetitor, p235 of this forum Regarding remaining anonymous, I think there is one other reason pe
Forum: Destructive Churches
3 months ago
ThePetitor
TheGreek said QuoteTheGreek They are already responsible for the most extensively complained about church in the UK by a long, long way. To pretend, as the recently published reply letter did, that this level of complaint and concern is just a minor and small scale matter of a few people makes them look like idiots. No only idiots, but liars. They absolutely 100% know their statement is no
Forum: Destructive Churches
3 months ago
ThePetitor
Esme, You really describe some horrible stuff. The Directors really need to be held to account about this. Why did they allow this? Did they not know it was going on?
Forum: Destructive Churches
3 months ago
ThePetitor
We have on this forum had some interesting debates about whether Struthers is a cult. If you have been around for a while, you will know I have have argued it may well be, partly because of its doctrine (it only uses half the Bible and adds in strange things about spirit-filled Christians needing deliverance form demons) but largely because of its exclusivism and demand that the leaders cannot
Forum: Destructive Churches
3 months ago
ThePetitor
There is so much in these letters it is hard to know where to start. I think what I will do, at least for now, simply pick specific parts as they come to the surface. I would first like to comment on: QuoteReply from SMC leadership to Pauline Anderson There is a specific issue with the Cult Education Forum. … Various individual members of our congregation have attempted to engage in dia
Forum: Destructive Churches
3 months ago
ThePetitor
Regarding remaining anonymous, I think there is one other reason people may chose to remain anonymous, and that is because they think points should be considered on their merit and irrespective of the author. This is why the traditional depiction of Justice includes a blindfold – judges should consider the facts and merits of a case, not who is speaking. If you read about an incident that som
Forum: Destructive Churches
3 months ago
ThePetitor
Small in number? They obviously missed my earlier post QuoteThePetitor, p205 I do not think there is any other church on the planet that has such a high ratio of unhappy ex-members to current members. There may in fact never have been another church in history that has this sort of ratio – 100 unhappy ex-members on this forum, and probably at least as many others who have not posted here, so
Forum: Destructive Churches
3 months ago
ThePetitor
Well interesting reading, thanks FF. I am sure that will generate a number of comments over the coming weeks. My initial thoughts are pretty simple. Letter from Pauline: 46 Scripture references. That provides a scriptural basis for discussion and debate. Reply from Struthers: zero scriptural references. zero. not one. Just, "well, the way we like to work is..." Do they even co
Forum: Destructive Churches
3 months ago
ThePetitor
London’s Calling – welcome to the forum. It is interesting to see a new generation of young folk being willing to add their own thoughts on all the interactions and shenanigans (both youthful and spiritual!) I really hope a number of you do manage to get in touch with each other and share a bit of camaraderie. That actually reminds me of something I have probably alluded to here and have cer
Forum: Destructive Churches
3 months ago
ThePetitor
As I seem to say a lot these days – some amazing, interesting posts recently. In terms of the pain people feel, and at times express here on the forum, others have already made a number of helpful comments, so I do not have much to add, but I will say that we have noted before that there is no single purpose for this forum – people will come on to it and use it in different ways. It seems to
Forum: Destructive Churches
3 months ago
ThePetitor
Esme, Welcome to the forum. All of that sounds just so horrible and demeaning. The stuff about trying to break people is just terrible. That basically is spiritual abuse. It is just incredible that leaders can hear that sort of story and not be filled with compassion. That is the real horror – that the leaders and indeed the members of the congregation can hear that sort of thing and
Forum: Destructive Churches
3 months ago
ThePetitor
I heard a rumour that the AGM is this week. I wonder if that is correct and if so, what sort of reports/ decisions will be presented. I am convinced that 80% of the Members think not making any effort to respond to this forum is an unscriptural and embarrassing failure on the part of the leaders. Whether that is even debated will to me give a very clear indication of whether the leadership a
Forum: Destructive Churches
3 months ago
ThePetitor
Amazing Grace, I think your final point, “I think I’ve come to the conclusion that SMC leadership were not business minded in a practical way. Basically their philosophy of ‘they hear directly from God’ put them in a sphere of unreality and they desperately failed to use the gifts of money from members in a transparent, productive way.” is really central to what went wrong in Struthers. It
Forum: Destructive Churches
3 months ago
ThePetitor
QuoteFatHippo On another note, let me ask a genuine question, perhaps someone who was in longer than me knows the answer: What ‘good’ does Struthers Memorial Church actually do? What positive benefit do they bring to society? That is a pretty good question. I presume they have somehow convinced OSCR that they do some good as they could not otherwise be a charity. I suspect OSCR have not loo
Forum: Destructive Churches
4 months ago
ThePetitor
Can I just add that, while I find the info above interesting and insightful, I recognise that there is a danger with looking at this level of detail, as it is easy to miss the big picture. So, let me repeat that one of the really big issues, which is the whole, "the vase just broke all by itself" problem. They are speaking of financial issues, structural issues, policy issues and oth
Forum: Destructive Churches
4 months ago
ThePetitor
I have had a look at the next section of the open letter and open reply and post my thoughts below. I am not sure this is the most important contribution, other have done a far better job of summarising the key issues, but I find it interesting to see how the specifics of the wording conveys a few hidden and not-so-hidden messages. So, here is is - feel free to ignore! I think I might need
Forum: Destructive Churches
4 months ago
ThePetitor
Anonymous_2023, welcome to the fourm. Thank you for speaking out and highlighting the impact that some of the Struthers practices have had. It is interesting to read of these recent events and to compare them to events from a few decades ago. I am in some ways quite amused at your mention of people referring back to “the glory days” as those of us who were there in “the glory days” will tel
Forum: Destructive Churches
Current Page: 1 of 12

This forum powered by Phorum.