being terror or being terrorized
Posted by: patrick-darcy ()
Date: January 30, 2003 02:24AM

in the empowerment process people
are dropped to their knees in terror
and then they are reduced to hysterical laughter when they are percieving as doing the terrorizing.


which is the positive and
which is the negative ?

being terror or being terrorized
Posted by: Pauly ()
Date: January 30, 2003 10:05AM

None of it - there is no solid evidence to suggest this "McDonaldized" version of mass hypnosis has any beneficial effect (personal accounts are dismissible due to the controlling effect that it does have).

Only under stringent conditions is hypnosis ever performed professionally.

This sort of practice is well documented as a pressurised/intimidative procedure where the subjects tend to feel as they SHOULD be transformed during the process - as such they run the danger of inducing psychosis.

It was also practiced by Charles Manson (ref: Helter Skelter by Mr. BUGLIOSI).

being terror or being terrorized
Posted by: patrick-darcy ()
Date: January 31, 2003 02:54AM

exactly, and yet people in the united
states allow it.

one group tells me that if the people
are that stupid then they deserve what they get.


another group tells me that and i quote "we dont need them"

other groups tell me that they dont care and that the nation will continue
without these people.


our nation will not survive as we become little groups that only want to
take care of themselves while letting everybody else go to hell.

Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
This forum powered by Phorum.