When people post encyclopedia links it also seems like running up the flag to salute.
That is, when some people can't make a meaningful point within a discussion, they start citing the encyclopedia.
Many would see this as a tacit admission you have no wind in your sails.
You seem fairly embedded in Landmark because it makes you feel good, which is an interesting point.
The results at Landmark are subjective not objective.
Didn't you ever wonder why there isn't one peer-reviewed scientific study that has been published demonstrating that their program has measurable results?
After all these years there is NOTHING objective to demonstrate their claims.
Just anecdotal stories like yours.
And Landmark certainly has the means to fund, conduct and produce meaningful research material.
And as you may already know the so-called "Harvard Study," was actually only a classroom exercise later disclaimed by the university.