Quote
sametanner
I think the only way to effectively combat them is to get LGATs regulated for use only by Psychiatric proffessionals under strict guidelines.
Do you honestly think that will solve anything? Then they'll just go get psychology degrees and infiltrate the APA to get these methods "approved" and continue to rake in the bucks.
Just because someone has a PhD doesn't mean they won't be greedy or unethical.
And do you distinguish between just a motivational seminar and a dangerous LGAT?
There is no way you will ever legally get the government to shut down LGATs for just medical professionals. People do have a right to free speech.
But you can educate people about the dangers beforehand, which is the bset you can do.
Ultimately, people are responsible for themselves and if they choose out of their free will to attend these things and get involved with them there is not much you can do. Try to educate them as much as you can beforehand, that's the best method of defense. If Landmark gets a reputation as a big joke like Scientology then people will think twice before signing up.
Even then, some people might still choose to go. That's their right. Frankly, I'd still rather see people doing that then becoming a drug addict or finding a worse coping mechanism. (There are worse coping mechanisms!)
Education, not regulation.