Hi Midnight,
This is particularly distressing, because in addition to all the usual problems with lgats, as you just said this one:
* manipulates people to use education grants that could be used for something that is actually useful.
* creates division in the band and community (usually restricted to family and friends)
* uses the structure of the band and community to recruit
* targets already disadvantaged people
:evil:
I wonder if you can speak to someone who is a political activist and hasn't been sucked into this yet? I'm just thinking that might be an extra angle you could use.
Have you read this article called "TRAGIC OPTIMISM AND CHOICES: THE LIFE ATTITUDES SCALE WITH A FIRST NATIONS SAMPLE"
[
www.twu.ca]
It is very biased, written by a psychology student who is clearly under the influence of Choices. It claims that the training improves Optimism and
'Life Attitude Scale' in people, and it is written in very effusive language for an academic article.
This is exactly the same finding of another study by psychologists, but interpreted differently. The other one basically found that the training had no positive effect on participants, only on their attitude to the training. ie. They all claimed their lives improved and the course had done wonders for them (the exact purpose of the brainwashing), but there was no evidence for this. So the conclusion was that the training was useless. The Choices study thinks the training is marvellous because it improves 'Optimism'.
If anyone has a link to that article (I can't find it) please can you paste the link here? I think it is important to have this link to contrast against the Choices article, because the Choices one is just propaganda wrapped in academic talk, and it comes up as soon as you search Choices on google, so it gives this very glowing expert approval to everything.
There are some very annoying statements in the Choices article, but I won't quote all of them because it would fill about six pages. Just one example though:
Quote
Most people attend personal growth seminars to work
through difficult circumstances in life and discover more reasons that life is worth living.
For the most part, they would not be there unless all of them needed help to some extent.
That's just not true. Most people are there because they were recruited and pressured by their families!
And one more:
Quote
All participants decide for themselves to exercise faith in the
leader and faith in the process. Box exhibits the type of leader qualities that give the seminar a lot of credibility. Most people see that at 69, her age is an advantage. She has a compelling personal story that resonates with others and inspires them. Her charismatic and dynamic presence in the training room is powerful. First Nations participants seem to
have few problems deciding to trust Box. They value her wisdom and give her the respect they believe she deserves as an elder. They also decide to have faith in her because of her six-year record of accomplishment with their people. They have seen for themselves and
heard about the positive changes in their communities.
Not very objective and academic!
Also worrying is quoted statistics about higher levels of suicide and mental health problems in first nation people, and the author even acknowledges in places that the training is rapid and potentially dangerous (buyer beware) and that it is uses Lifespring techniques (Lifespring has settled out of court for causing suicides) - but then she still endorses it. Total logical disconnect in this author who sees problems then carries on in glowing terms anyway!
In summary: The entire PURPOSE of an lgat is to manipulate people's emotions to create a false high (optimism) - SO THAT the person will go out and recommend the course to everyone else - SO THAT the lgat makes more money.
The academic article completely misses the point.
How much do the courses cost? How many people have done how many courses? What is the overhead - almost zero, since the courses use volunteers. That is the profit this ruthless businesswoman is making, while claiming to be 'changing the world'.