Quote
No outside force can 'make me' do anything*... (nor can any 4-day class 'ruin' someone's life... that's victim mentality). The wars and strife in this world come from VICTIM and SCARCITY thinking (like a lot of what I'm reading on this website)-
Outside forces can make you do a great deal, especially if the means of influence is not fully disclosed to you.
If there is a scarcity of information about what is going to be done to you during a weekend, a scarcity mentality is appropriate--in this case, there is a scarcity of information making your adult and informed consent impossible.
Take a look at Philip Zimbardo's Stanford Prison Experiment. This was a simulated prison environment. Student subjects were randomly assigned the roles of prisoners or guards. They were told beforehand they were free to leave at any time.
But during the days that followed, the students assigned to be guards became more brutal, the students assigned to the roles of prisoners became more submissive and accepting of brutality and IN BOTH ROLES the subjects FORGOT they were free to leave.
Even Professor Zimbardo recalled that he slipped into the mentality and lost sight of how bad things were getting. It was only when his girlfriend (whom he later married) walked in and said things had gone too far that Zimbardo realized they had to end the experiment early before someone was hurt beyond repair.
Ironically, the Prison Experiment could not be repeated. The American Psychological Association revised its guidelines for experiments, making it impossible for anyone to ever do these kinds of experimental simulations again--they are considered too risky.
But what is considered unacceptable risk by APA researchers who recognize power and have seen and demonstrated how human beings can be affected by outside forces--these kinds of experiments, now considered unacceptably risky by ethical researchers who are accountable to an ethos of care...
are being done in LGAT seminars all over the country, in which the use of power is denied through language that is pseudoegalitarian--but conceals that there is an ongoing and nonbenevolent power imbalance--and that the entire thing is conducted using language that make it impossible to conduct any examination or discussion of this power imbalance.
When we use the 'there-are-no victims' argument, this lets the actual powerholder escape both accountability and scrutiny--and escape responsiblity for use/misuse of their actual power.
Does PSI require you to sign away your right to litigate for damages in event you discover afterwards you have been harmed?
No mental health professional makes you sign such paperwork.
Anyone who pushes you to sign such paperwork is refusing to accept responsiblity for their power and is refusing to accept responsibility for what they are going to do to you during that weekend.
Instead if anything goes wrong--you, the subject, get stuck feeling responsible for a situation that is orchestrated without your full knowledge.
To me, the two big warning signs are:
1) Use of 'there are no victims' or a blaming stance toward victim mentality.
2) Being made to sign away your right as a citizen to litigate for damages in the event that you are harmed during the weekend.
Anything that has a strong enough effect to do good can in some cases, do harm. Antibiotics have saved lives, but this does not cancel out that they can have side effects.
Just read the package insert for any prescribed medication.
If anyone says something is powerful and life changing and never harmful---that's baloney.
All things potent enough to do good can generate harmful side effects. And a responsible vendor will state exactly what the side effects are so that you can make an informed choice whether to do it or not.
Since many of these entities refuse to report their harmful side effects and shame people who try to mention this, RR.com is one of the very few places in cyberspace where such reports can be offered.