Roommate coming back from Advanced Personal Dynamics
Date: July 10, 2005 10:59PM
Wow. That's a tough one. Assuming it is similar to other LGATS, the "advanced training" is traumatic, abusive, and psychologically devastating - sort of like boot camp - and with the same sort of agenda, that being to disabuse someone of their previous "identity," habits, responses, thinking style, and personality, and mold them into a new "group" mentality.
Though they must make every attempt to disguise the "damage," it might be almost like living with someone you don't know, someone who has suffered a head injury or who is losing his mind in early Alzheimer's or, what they used to call, dementia praecox. (I would say it was like living with an alcoholic or drug user but at least with an addict, they are sober some of the time.) Remember the military inducements targeting the young with a handsome man in uniform and the promise, "The Changes Are Permanent?" It's like that.
I don't know what I would do. Looking back, I would probably move out, move away, or attempt to put as much geography as I could between myself and the other person. That might not be difficult if he (she) is truly sucked in and knows you are critical of the group, as he will become more and more distant even if neither of you moves.
Just as some vague background material, Lifespring was even scarier than est in some disturbing ways I'm not sure I can articulate. They might have taken the whole "choice" thing a little more literally or something. As I recall, someone jumped into a river and drowned during a Lifespring training. He didn't know how to swim and thought he could just "choose" to swim, or something. There was a 60 Minutes-type expose on the group back in the 1970s or 80s. They actually closed shop for a while, but, like some kind of noxious weeds, insects, or vermin, they are ever seeking opportunities (~possibilities~).
Knowing what I now know, I can see some other options for you if you don't want to move, but it will take some labor. If you can, try to provide a "reality check" with as little criticism, impatience, or digust as you can. Be firm, but friendly, knowing that the indoctrination and new personality are similar to a disease or mental illness. If you are "non-threatening," when the inevitable disillusion appears he will feel comfortable asking you for information. It may take awhile and you may have to endure a lot of proselytizing, many lectures, and much "coaching."
Though "fans" of these groups like to claim that most people who take the "programs" are benefitted, improve their lives, have fewer problems and better "attitudes," I do not believe this. In my opinion, the supposed "improvements" are cosmetic, illusory, and mostly short-lived. I think even those who appear to be minimally affected can have deeper and more covert damage done to their emotional or psychological health that will only play out over the long term in ways known and unkown only in retrospect and speculation. I would like to think this is not always the case but I have seen that the effort to overcome the damage these programs can inflict to be herculean. Imagine, if I can use a simple example, that someone operating with the basic assumption that most people mean well, are honest, and will treat you fairly has that assumption psychologically "reprogrammed" to an assumption that most people are only out for themselves, will take advantage of you if you're not careful, and that "it's a dog-eat-dog world." How might that person's behavior change? I think you can see the implications.
Good luck to you. Keep us informed.
Ellen