Quote
rrmoderator
radaph:
You say, "God will deal with him. If you feel he wronged you in some way, then God will pay him back with vengeance. But that is not your job as a Christian, and you should know that. Any pastor would tell you that, especially Thieme."
Thieme may have offered such a teaching, but it is not what "any pastor" would either say or teach.
In fact few would offer such false teachings.
What you are describing is a dictatorship, where accountability to the congregation of believers has been essentially eliminated.
Overwhelmingly, Protestant churches have congregational and denominational accountability, through elected boards and officers.
When someone within a church has a grievance they can take it to someone as established on earth, as well as God through prayer.
The New Testament provided for this specifically through its discussion of deacons, elders and evangelists. An evangelist would essentially be considered a pastor today.
Paul openly criticized leaders on earth (read Galatians) and even the Apostle Peter (read Acts).
Sorry, but if this is what Thieme taught, he was wrong.
No, I am not describing a dictatorship.
Look, I am talking about this in the here and now. And from that perspective, there is absolutely nothing you can do about the Col's teachings if you don't like it that will change anything at all. He is retired. He is probably incapable at this point of even giving a sermon, let alone writing any more books, etc.
So if you have a problem with his ministry, your problem is in the past, and it doesn't exist anymore. The Col isn't making anyone listen to tapes anymore (not that he ever was, but he has been so accused). If they do it, they can't blame him. It's their choice.
My advice at this point is to let God handle it.
My advice would be different 25 years ago, when he was still teaching, and you were a member of his congregation.
In that case, if you had a sincere complaint, I would recommend you talk to one of the church deacons. They are very nice men, and they will listen to you. And I gaurantee if you talked to the Col in an objective way, he would listen to you too. He would probably not agree with you when the dust settled, because he did not come to his viewpoints lightly. He studied hard and prayed hard to come to his doctrinal points of view, and therefore would not easily be swayed. But I am sure he would've listened.
Mind you he wouldn't have listened if you made an outburst during church. That is rude, and distracting, and it's not the time or place for such things. I've not known very many churches where this type of thing was acceptable. Berachah was no exception.
But after church, the Col is around for a while. He wouldn't turn you away if you had a question. Or you could email him. That applies to Bobby (RBT III) as well.
This unapproachable attribute that everyone wants to give the colonel is just not true. Now in his later years, his health made it such that it was all he could do to stand at the podium for an hour, so after church he quickly retreated to his office, to sit down and rest. But the door was wide open every time I walked by there.