Re: Struthers Memorial Independent Pentecostal Church
Date: April 30, 2026 01:52PM
Liz25,
I note your statement that people may never get answers, but I have to disagree.
As there are a number of reasons for my view I have divided into sections, each of which comes at this from a different perspective. Not a dig at you though - just my thoughts/analysis on this issue.
1 The factual perspective
+++++++++++++++++
It is a fact that apologies have been issued in the past, so this is far from impossible. There is even one noted on this forum.
Admittedly the leaders of Struthers make this hard on themselves as they could apologise when things first come to light. Instead, the pattern is generally denial, obfuscation and indifference - until lawyers or others with authority get involved.
I can see no sensible reason for these delaying tactics. These things always escalate as time goes on – look at the Post Office debacle, the Hillsborough disaster, the Windrush scandal. People do not give up, they actually become more incensed over time.
As an example, I spoke to someone this week who said, “I will keep fighting for justice [for a Struthers Survivor] long after they have gone.” That is not the first person I have heard express that sort of commitment. This will not go away and there will be apologies, whether now or in 100 years. What a stupid, uncaring legacy for the current leaders to leave the next generation if they do not bite the bullet and address these things.
2 The responsibility perspective
++++++++++++++++++++++
Part of the problem with the suggestion that people will not get answers is that it carries no moral dimension.
The key question is not what is likely to happen. Especially from a Christian perspective, the key question is never “what will this achieve?” or “what is the pragmatic thing to do?”, the question is always, in every single case, “what it’s the right thing to do?”
So, in that sense, whether the leaders answer or not is irrelevant, the question is not whether raising issues will lead to answers, but whether raising issues is the right thing to do.
Diana tells you it is wrong to raise issues because it disturbs her spiritual equanimity, and that you are less spiritual if you dare to question things.
The Bible tells you that the fight for justice is central to the gospel and that it is our responsibility to speak the truth to power.
Which will you follow, Member of Struthers? Will you follow a false prophet (evidenced for example by the New Year Word message that all will be peaceful and her own sermon a few weeks ago about how stressed she was by all the complaints) or the Word of God?
3 the human perspective - there may yet be some decency left
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Okay, this one may surprise some readers.
I think we can still hope that there is some decency left in some of these people.
Some readers may of course have written off all of the SMC leaders as unable to ever repent of the callous treatment they inflicted. That view is understandable, and hard to argue against when you see their pathological indifference to any sort of pain in others, but… that does not mean there is no hope that their eyes may yet be opened this side of the river.
A recent exchange I witnessed included three different people all making positive comments about one person in a leadership role.
Admittedly the initial comment was that this person was capable of relating to others “before Mr Black knocked all that sympathy nonsense out of her so she could be ‘spiritual’ instead.” Still, three different people with a positive view of underlying kindness and understanding: there may yet be a spark of decency there.
It is not impossible for eyes to be opened and I do not accept the only possible conclusion is they will never repent. The OT is full of people finding God’s way after years of indifference.
4 the truth will out
+++++++++++++
Part of the reason this is able to go on is that the Members of the congregation - and even some of the Trustees - have no idea what is going on. (Is it correct that one Trustee is for example deliberately kept in the dark about anything related to safeguarding? Why would that be?) Who knows - but, at some point, truth will out. Someone will actually pursue a question like, “so Diana, how often have you had to speak to a lawyer in the last two years?” and will be persistent enough to insist on a number - not bland assurances that all must be well because she is so spiritual.
As soon as people asking the question hear that number, they will be phoning their own lawyer. Why? Because they will belatedly realise that decisions are being made in their name without their knowledge, and that their personal interests no longer align with the interests of the organisation.
I wonder if any of the leaders have actually been in that sort of situation where they are being asked questions under oath. “Mr Smith, have you read the issues raised on the forum?”; “Do you accept you are as a Director are responsible for the actions of the organisation?”; “Did you raise any of this at a Board meeting?”; “Do you have a record of the explanation you were given?”; "did you think this was the correct ting to do?"; "Did you ask wether the safeguarding policy had been applied?"; "What evidence did you ask for?"; "would you have acted this way?": “Were you satisfied with the verbal assurances you were given?”; “Did you not think to ask for these comments in writing?”; “Did you ask what action was being taken in your name?” “What action did you take to verify what was being said?” The list goes on. People can be questioned in this way for hours, it is not the five minutes you see on TV. Truth will out.
Not sure “I was simply following orders because these people are so spiritual” is going to cut it in that sort of circumstance.
5 the scriptural perspective
++++++++++++++++++
I have already spent far too long on this, so will keep this short.
Many stories show that perseverance beyond what is reasonable is rewarded. Sarah, Hannah, Elizabeth, Samson’s mother, the persistent widow pestering the judge in the parable Jesus told. In every case these people persevered long after it was “reasonable” -and they were rewarded for it.
That is the message of scripture. So, again folks, which will you believe – the false prophets telling you all will be well, or the word of God?