I was reading Titus this morning and came across the following:
Quote
Titus 1v6
An elder must be blameless, faithful to his wife, a man whose children believe and are not open to the charge of being wild and disobedient
I was just wondering about the last part of that, the expectation that the children of leaders should at least show respect for their parents and the path they tread. We obviously have statements on this forum that claim the children of some of the youth leaders we bullies. These claims are not just vague, but are backed up with specific incidences.
Whether the Struthers movement calls these “youth leaders” elders or not, they clearly are elders in a Biblical sense.
So… were they asked to step down form this role? Should it even have needed someone to ask them? If they are reading this now, should they not realise they cannot be in a position of authority and step back?
It made me wonder about how many “leaders” in Struthers have had children whose children
believe and are not open to the charge of being wild and disobedient.
Are there
ANY?
If we count up the figures of authority in the church we get to something like thirty.
Original trustees: 6
Highest number of branch leaders: 12 at one point?
Current Trustees: 6
Current branch leaders: 6?
Other “elders” – those in charge of youth and/ or who preach once a month: 6?
If all this is added up you get say 35-40, but there will of course be some overlap so, I don’t know, 30 perhaps? Of these, how many have all their children who “believe and are not (or, if they are not older, were not) open to the charge of being wild and disobedient”?
Three elders perhaps, so 10% of the total? Are there even that many? I do not know, but it would be interesting for someone to compile a list of those in positions of authority and how many meet even this simple Biblical standard.
Don't get me wrong, bringing up children is not easy and I do not think there is a formula that works every time (I much prefer the idea of "good enough" parenting that professionals often speak about these days). But we are talking about elders with responsibility for showing the way to others. Were they actually showing the way, or just talking about something they did not really apply in their own lives?
Whatever there answer, we have to be able to question these things.