Tom Cruise sacked
Date: August 28, 2006 10:32PM

Paramount parting ways with big mouth Tom Guru-se? When I heard the news, I almost punched the air. And came back here expecting celebrations!

What do you all think? Is it really a case of Tom-too-bizarre-for-Paramount? Or is it a media beat-up more to do with actors' salaries and pay reforms in Hollywood than an anti-Scientology shift?

Options: ReplyQuote
Tom Cruise sacked
Posted by: Brad69 ()
Date: August 28, 2006 11:16PM

Maybe he needs to be cleared of some demon thetans that have invaded his psyche.

Or is it that thetans are misguiding the leadership of Paramount? :wink:

Forget the Illuminati. The thetans are taking over the world! The end is nigh!

Options: ReplyQuote
Tom Cruise sacked
Posted by: nutrino ()
Date: September 06, 2006 01:19AM

Tom Cruise now even more sacked... today's news:

"Although the company said today that Mr. Freston had resigned, Mr. Redstone, the 84-year-old controlling shareholder of Viacom, has been telling associates in Hollywood that he felt Mr. Freston was not a strong enough leader for the company, according to several people who have talked to Mr. Redstone but spoke on the condition of anonymity, saying they did not want to jeopardize relationships in Hollywood.

That discontent boiled over recently when Mr. Redstone indicated that he was displeased that Viacom had not severed its relationship with Tom Cruise’s production company. Mr. Redstone has told associates that Mr. Cruise’s behavior had cost the company lost revenue on Mission Impossible 3 and that Mr. Freston and his hand-picked head of Paramount Pictures, Brad Grey, were too slow to terminate Paramount’s agreement with Mr. Cruise."

Roundturn this through a Ronspeak emulator...

"As for the person that you resigned, the Freston company said today, but Redstone, 84 year person - the person spoke to the person Redstone spoke of anonymous state, but following to the people of some person, for the company the sufficiently strong leader, the dominant shareholder where the Freston thing Viacom where he feels that is not is old Hollywood is the companion directly, to expose the Hollywood relationship to danger, you did not think that word you want.

Viacom relationship with the company of production of cruise of tom as for him who does not become extinct when the person shows the fact that it makes unpleasant the excess which is boiled by the dissatisfaction of Redstone recent times. Cruise Paramount Motion Pictures of the person to finish agreement, it was slow even excessively, but that it is, the companion it is said to Redstone that conduct of the person way the earnings which are lost by the company of spy large maneuvers 3 are required the top of the selection of Cruise's, and person Freston and that Paramount Pictures, you stop gray with the shellfish hooked nail. “

Options: ReplyQuote
Tom Cruise sacked
Posted by: elena ()
Date: September 06, 2006 03:04AM

ROTFLMAO....

How'd he ever attract the first follower? It boggles the mind.


(What'd you use, Korean?)



Ellen

Options: ReplyQuote
Tom Cruise sacked
Date: September 06, 2006 10:59PM

And now gay kisses over at John Travolta's corner of the world.

I'm beginning to suspect an orchestrated coup. What's next?! Jenna Elfman exposed as a mediocre actress??

Options: ReplyQuote
Tom Cruise sacked
Posted by: nutrino ()
Date: September 07, 2006 12:12AM

The message would appear to be that even being associated with TC is a bad idea.... Sumner may be sending a warning shot over the bow that Scientology better keep its fingers out of the production process...

Options: ReplyQuote


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
This forum powered by Phorum.