What concerns me is that each year the UK Border Agency cannot be bothered to deport the thousands of illegal immigrants who are known to be convicted murderers, rapists etc and leaves them free to murder and rape at will again ---but moves the entire legal and security apparatus of the state against one website owner who may or may not have sought consent on condom use in another country
That is a world wide issue, that our politicans and senators do not really want to touch. I agree with you 100% on this point, but factions in the Socialist parties and communit parties protest for these people to stay within the country.
You missed a great wiki page, Lord Haw Haw, on your namesake who was hanged for treason after working as a Nazi propagandist.
It makes so much better reading than the Sun, Daily Mail or News of the World.
The News of the World had to close its multi-million pound business overnight recently when it ran into its own problems with illegal activities and tampering with the truth. The inquiry is ongoing and will see off a few more of the untruthful tabloids yet, I think.
I am not a big fan of trash magainzes, and newspapers, that mix news stories with cheap entertainment.
And the Swedish woman victim, BTW, is rumoured to have CIA links.
Rumours are ust idle gossip with no substance, and that comment shows where you are coming from, by throwing the victim under the car, for somebody you appear to admire.
I agree websites like these are needed to expose the truths that cults are doing around the world and to their members. But it needs be carefully fact checked. Cant just have one person coming into a forum, slamming a group, just due to the fact they did not agree with it, and their is no other evidence that they prouduce that the group in question is harmful. It happens far too much, people do not care if its libel, they just have their own issue and do not look at the bigger picture.
I could example would be someone with say pro-choice belief attenting a church with pro-life beliefs. They should not be able to run to a site labelling a church a cult, just because they differed on that issue. If the group is not harmful, they should not be thrown to the wolves, for the sake of one person who just needsto toughen up.
In cases of dangerous groups that is an entirely different matter.