I don't condone 'nothing but the CC.'; I do condone free thinkintg; I don't understand how I could be percieved to only be here to "victim bash", but I I am speaking in a 'cult forum'. Therefore, whatever I have brought up could be filtered to that end. Likewise, I would expect that "victims" take responsibility". I am not a representative of the CC, nor have I been asked to speak on their behalf. But I do see that a common complaint is the result of a lack of personal responsibility. I am not personally attacking/flaming anyone, I am simply pointing out that choice is a factor in making serious personal accusations. May I ask how you consider my opinions to be misdirected?

Quote
rrmoderator
boo_spooky:

You seem to be here to attack people personally and engage in victim bashing.

Apparently everyone but CC is wrong according to your mindset.

Please understand that victim bashing and personal attacks are in violation of the rules you agreed to before posting here.

Frankly, you appear to be the one that is "misdirected" and "not...justified."

boo_spooky:

What responsibility does CC have regarding the complaints posted here?

What in your opinion has CC done that is wrong?

What mistakes has CC made?

When is CC responsible?

And what association have you had historically with CC?

Personal choice and responsibility for one's actions concerning the CC will continue to be the hole in your argument. You may remove me from your forum if you find my refusal to bend myself to your way of thinking doesn't sit well with you.

boo_spooky:

You did not answer a single question asked.

That's the "hole" in your presence here.

You are unwilling to have any meaningful exchange.

Just you attacking people and defending CC.

Is a meaningful exchange one where you ask questions and attempt to direct the flow of conversation, and demand that I should follow it? Why not shape the questions in a reversed way (i.e. "When isn't CC responsible?") or would the questions then be biased, in your opinion. They would reflect your sentiments above.

People have free will, people's personal choices are for them to make and are their own, and the responsibility of one's choices lies with them.

It is getting boring reiterating this, so....I may not respond in favor of something fun

boo_spooky:

Again, please simply answer these questions. If you mean to engage in a discussion this should be no problem.

What responsibility does CC have regarding the complaints posted here?

What in your opinion has CC done that is wrong?

What mistakes has CC made?

When is CC responsible?

And what association have you had historically with CC?

This is how it is to talk to my mother. You get nowhere, just going in circles until ultimately you just give up on the conversation entirely. It's pointless to get engaged in a conversation with someone like this.

John, re wife.
Read my responses on Crimson.
Here is an exert:
For now, take into consideration that Crimson’s unexplained and unknown “Tobias” possessed the body of a 9-year old boy of the USA, during 2009. Ask yourself who is this spirit who came IN A CHANGED FORM on the scene via Crimson during 2007…THE YEAR DESTENI PRODUCTIONS (Poolman) BECAME ACTIVE…two great possessors!
The questions therefore are:
1. Who is the new/2nd Tobias of Crimson?
2. Was there a take-over of Crimson during this period? By who? Do the Hoppe’s know of it?
3. Is ex Hitler (Urgen) involved” (or whatever his name is, even it be 666) involved?
But of course.
4.

DonH SA:

Please don't personally insult and attack members of this message board.

One of your posts was deleted for this reason.

Also, what exactly is your purpose here?

Are you attempting to promote a belief in spiritual possession or what?

To whom it may concern:

DonH SA has been banned from this message board.