Below are some excerpts of talk about the launching of a Church of Transhumanism Cryonics, before it get's deleted, as they have tried to suppress the connections to forming a church/religion. They are very aware of the cult-like aspects of what they are doing, and those perceptions.
You can see in real time, as they persuade people to NOT use the word "Church" and move to new words, eventually to using the word "Society". This is the same process of the Church of Venturism changing to the Society of Venturism, which is deeply fused with Alcor, and seems to control Alcor behind the scenes.
Take note of the comments by Mike Perry from Alcor/Venturism.
This is the linguistic propaganda of memes, meant to disguise their religous beliefs behind a more neutral sounding terminology for the public.
These folks are very conscious about the ENGINEERING OF MEMES in the public mind. This is why they post their Cryonics Talking Points, every chance they get.
So some of them are highly skilled in manipulating the memes/ideas they are putting into people's minds, which is related to Thought Reform in groups and cults.
They are doing it very consciously and with precision, they even designed a cryonic Pascal's Wager.
So what reads to the trained eye as cryonic propaganda, is their injection of their engineered cryonic meme into the minds of those they can reach.
________________________________________________________
[
www.imminst.org]
Launch of New Transhumanist Church Website
23-May 2004, 02:45 PM Post #1
Threadstarter
I am very pleased to announce the launch of the new Transhumanist
Church website at [
www.transhumanistchurch.org] . There are many
new and exciting features at our website that I invite you to explore
and make use of. From our mailing lists to our articles section, you
will find a wide range of discussions concerning the aspects of our
beliefs. Over the coming weeks and months many new features will be
added, bringing even more information and services to our members. If
you have never visited the Transhumanist Church's website before,
or haven't given us a look in a while, I encourage you to check us
out. After all, it's everyone's eternal future we are fighting for!
Live well, live forever!
Tripper McCarthy
President – Transhumanist Church
www.transhumanistchurch.org
*********************
The above content is pretty nice stuff, but that doesn't matter because you're taking the religion path. No one is going to read it with an open mind, and certainly none of the opinion-makers in the media are going to see you as anything other than a cultist. It's hard enough to get them to take transhumanism itself seriously without this sort of handicap.
If a transhumanism group calls itself a church and gets any sort of media attention while positioning itself as a religion (which neither Virus nor Venturism have really achieved, thankfully) then we all get painted as cultists, no better than the Raelians. By extension, anything we talk about or advocate is also prejudiced in the minds of the masses.
While I appreciate the arguments for long term memetic engineering via religion, so long as you are positioning yourself in this way, any success you achieve will greatly damage the credibility and efforts made by all other transhumanist groups. The long term doesn't matter if we all die because [life extension = cultish activity ~ UFOs ~ strange, impossible things] becomes a dominant meme in the short term.
Reason
Founder, Longevity Meme
[
www.longevitymeme.org]
**************************************
26-May 2004, 10:42 PM Post #5
Responses:
“none of the opinion-makers in the media are going to see you as anything other than a cultist”
Every group with radically different ideas starts off basically being seen as a “cult” (in the negative sense) and a disruptive force. People are threatened by things different than themselves and respond by dismissive ridicule. Look at the treatment Alcor and other cryonics institutions received in the early days (and still do). Thank god they didn’t heed your warning and go away, or we would all (cryonauts) be worse off.
“If a transhumanism group calls itself a church and gets any sort of media attention while positioning itself as a religion (which neither Virus nor Venturism have really achieved, thankfully) then we all get painted as cultists, no better than the Raelians. By extension, anything we talk about or advocate is also prejudiced in the minds of the masses”
It already is prejudiced in the “minds of the masses” for a million different reasons. If you believe you will ever get a fair, unprejudiced hearing, I think you are being a bit naïve. Besides, those people that link your organization with ours, and call us all a bunch of cultists, were probably predisposed to make that judgment anyway for whatever reason seemed convenient.
“any success you achieve will greatly damage the credibility and efforts made by all other transhumanist groups”
If they can’t survive in the sea of ideas on their own merit, they shouldn’t blame others for their lacking.
“isn't a religion a set of beliefs directed towards a certain ends”
Well said. I bet if I labeled the Transhumanist Church a philosophical organization, a lot of these negative reactions would fade away. People are so afraid of the “R” word. But guess what, most people on this planet belong to a religion. Wouldn’t you want a religion that preaches humanist and transhumanist ideas instead of one stepped in mysticism and supernaturalism with intolerant and inflexible dogma?
...
I’m sorry if the idea of a Transhumanist Church upsets some, but there is clearly interest in the idea. And as long as there is, we will be around pursuing our own agenda. I sincerely hope that we can all “get along” and be respective of each other’s beliefs and opinions. We will never all agree, but then again this world would be a pretty stagnant place if we did.
Tripper McCarthy
President – Transhumanist Church
www.transhumanistchurch.org
**********************************
I definitely have respect for you and your initiative, I'm just trying to have some positive criticism here. The manner in which this "church" functions seems much better than the way the archaic inflexible institutions of today function. However you may want to think about renaming it instead of calling it a church with all the baggage associated with that word and implied meaning that people might first think of. Consider calling it something else rather than a church, this would not be a radical change on your part and may be to your advantage.
*****************************
I agree completely church has connotations that may damage the transhumanist meme, because that's exactly what it is a meme. How about Transhumanist Meme center! Something like that, I am a member and proud to be a member but I agree on your points
***************************
27-May 2004, 03:24 PM Post #9
My feeling is that, yes, there will be problems with using the term "Church" and calling your movement a religion, but it should be attempted. Many people think "religion" necessarily means fantasies about spirits or some such irrational belief system. I think that most seriously misses the point, however, and I am not alone. You can see what I mean by doing a Google search on "definition of religion." A definition of my own that reflects this different and (to me) more enlightened and positive view is: "A religion is a body of attitudes, beliefs, and practices whose intended purpose is a meaningful engagement with what can reasonably be regarded as having transcendent or ultimate significance." I won't say this is unobjectionable--refinements and/or other adjustments may be in order--but it seems a reasonable start. I also think that modern, scientific immortalism opens new, exciting possibilities in the field of non-supernatural religion, and that is a major theme we are trying to develop in the Transhumanist Church. It amounts to a tremendous, new, scientific, gospel, something that I think can hold its own with and ultimately outpoint its less scientific precursors, which many people think comprise the whole of "religion." We need to do this. For we are addressing what is of deepest significance, and what, I think, will determine in the end whether the life that has evolved on planet Earth goes on indefinitely or self-destructs. Science may possibly supply the means to become immortal but by itself cannot accomplish the task. You also need motivation, and not just light or transient, but the kind that can span eternity and sustain an infinite commitment--that is what religion is really about.
Mike Perry
Secretary,
Transhumanist Church and also Society for Venturism
**************************
I think you should take the excellent advice offered here to rename your organization/website to something that doesn't include the word "religion." You may not be aware of it, but the Society for Venturism was originally established as the Church of Venturism, but then changed its name for the very same reasons being discussed here.
If you want to get people thinking about the future of humans and technology in a more open-minded way, great. But don't mess with their religion by proposing you have something better.
---BrianW
*************************
28-May 2004, 10:29 PM Post #11
My previous response was directed at Tripper, and written before I noticed that the message just before mine was in fact written by Mike Perry (cofounder of the Society for Venturism) not Tripper. Far be it from me to tell Mike the reasons he changed "Church" to "Society" in his organization name. Though in my recollection it was in response to concerns that "Church" would be misunderstood.
All I can say is what I've always said: It's easier to sell a philosophy than a religion. Religion occupies a special compartment of the human mind that people don't like challenged or messed with. Just because some people have a secular philosophy plugged into their religion compartment doesn't mean the religion compartment of others is the best target for that philosophy-- especially when secular philosophies by nature can easily fit in other compartments that need not conflict with religion.
Over the course of abundant time and generations, it's quite possible that secular philosophies will eventually displace supernatural philosophies from the religion compartment of most people. But that's a very threatening prospect to supernaturalists, so to force the issue at this time and place in history (USA, 2004) risks unnecessary backlash against the goals of transhumanists generally.
In short, a Transhumanist "Church" seems like a surefire way to annoy both transhumanists and Christians alike.
---BrianW
****************************
The issue has been brought up that once the Venturist organization was also called a church, but that this was changed (to the present title of Society for Venturism). This came about from pressure from the transhumanist camp of that day (late 1980s), particularly cryonicists. Indeed, much the same objections were raised then as now. I came to favor the change myself but do not favor it now, in part because, while the Venturist society is an umbrella organization accommodating many points of view under the broad groupings of cryonics and (if suitably understood) religion, the Transhumanist Church is more specialized. I happen to favor this specialization personally, but many cryonicists, including some notable instances among the Venturists, will not. So Religious Transhumanism, aside from any terminological issues, will not appeal to everyone, but for some of us the appeal will be powerful and the terminology appropriate.
--Mike Perry
************************************
It's unfortunate that you don't agree with my view that you should not use "church" in the name of your group/organization/religion. It will be a detriment to your goals in my opinion, I'm far too immature in my knowledge of Transhumanism in it's various forms to argue deeply into this, but I don't think it would be in the nature of Transhumanism to be associated with the institution of organized religion. Transhumanism may indeed by a religion in some form, but the word church implies a place of worship and it's generally associated with Christianity. Give the name more thought if anything, a name is like a first impression while it's fallacious to base your view on a first impression many people do, inherently. The stigma or association people may have with the word "church" could drive them away at first sight.
***************************
3-Jun 2004, 12:36 AM Post #19
Group: Registered User
Threadstarter
After thinking about several of the messages posted here, especially Brian’s, I now agree that the Transhumanist Church is due for a name change. ...
I now support Mike’s suggestion to change the name of our organization to the ‘Church of Aionism’. Both he and Brian have laid out some convincing arguments as to why this name would be more suiting. We are currently discussing this change among our ‘Voters’ and I hope we will come to some resolution on this issue soon.
...
Tripper McCarthy
*********************
4-Jun 2004, 01:40 PM Post #23
From: San Diego, CA
I believe that "Society for Universal Immortalism" is the best name overall.
1. It drops the word "church" and all of the connotations of
traditional dogma.
2. It drops the word "transhumanism". Since our ideas go beyond "orthodox" Transhumanism, it is better that we don't capitalize on their name and upset a large number of people in our "base". Also, Transhumanism is just a subset of our more encompasing ideas. Using the word probably doesn't adequetly or
fully discribe our views, I think.
3. It is very straightforward. No weird words.
4. The word "society" is very acceptable for a religious organization (i.e. Society of Friends - Quakers). It sounds non-threating and approachable.
...
****************************
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 02/05/2009 05:06AM by The Anticult.