Posted by: Lakefield ()
Date: August 26, 2004 11:56AM

What are your thoughts on this?.

how can something so remote be so old?

Posted by: Dervish ()
Date: August 26, 2004 08:02PM

Are we talking about the ancient Persian religion of Zoroastrianism?

Posted by: Lakefield ()
Date: August 29, 2004 03:49PM


Posted by: Toni ()
Date: September 04, 2004 11:26AM

What does Zarathustra have to do with modern cultism?

Posted by: Lakefield ()
Date: September 05, 2004 02:47PM

Well it's something that could be a cult.. some of their views are a little questionable. Especially their teachings on angels, microcosm and cosmology.

Posted by: corboy ()
Date: September 06, 2004 04:53AM

(Written by Toni and moved to this thread by Corboy at author's request)

Views on angels, cosmology, etc do NOT a cult make.

A cult uses thought reform methods to recruit people, indoctrinate them with a hidden agenda and then manipulate them to serve the selfish desires of the leader(s). the teaching are irrelevant... religious, political, psychological, business marketing...
have you read anything on this web site?

If you have anything useful to contribute about the cultish structure/abuse/etc of this ancient sect, then spill it to us for our edificiation, please. Otherwise, please don't waste our time anylonger.

thank you

Posted by: corboy ()
Date: September 06, 2004 04:54AM

Zoaroastrianism is not a problem. Their membership is relatively small, mostly in Western India (where they are known as 'Parsis') and another community in Iran, mostly in the city of Yazd. Some live in the West, and will most likely be found in areas with a vibrant South Indian community--eg Silicon Valley?Northern California.

Zoarostrians do not do aggressive outreach--or even much outreach at all, which is why they may in danger of disappearing in a few more generations, as more and more of their children marry outside the community.

One is usually born a Parsi--one reason why they are such a small group. Their history is ancient, and Judaism and Christianity would be unrecognizable, had it not been for Zoarastrianism. Ditto for Islam.

Search for them on Google. This websiste is to assist persons concerned by groups that have a well-documented track record of abuse.

The Zoroastrians are not on anyone's complaint list. Quite the contrary. According to the Lonely Planet Guide to India, the Parsis were even called in as respected third parties to mediate disputes between Muslims and Hindus!

A seminary professor of ours tried to help us understand that, underneath all thier different belief systems, fanatics have a similar psychology.

His comment also applies to cults vs legit spiritual organizations:

'Same hardware, different software'

--hardware referring to the social and physical methods of coercion, deceit, indoctrination, black/white thinking, manipulation of mood


--software--the content of the belief system.

What makes a cult a cult is its 'hardware'--its social process/use of physical environment, not its software.

One group can use the King James Bible and be a church

Another group can use that same bible and function as a cult.

Read more on the part of the website that deals with 'Mind Control'

The finest, most honorable spiritual tradition can be perverted into a mere form of indoctrination, if used to disguise and legitimate a coercive social arrangement.

Orthodox Christianity is a completely legitimate spiritual tradition. Yet there are some variant forms of it that have gone in cultic directions--you can read about all this on the website

As another example, when properly understood and practiced, Zen Buddhism is AGAINST any form of indoctrination. Yet Zen practices were perverted and tweaked to create a format for militarism and indoctrination in pre-WWII Japan--described by Brian Victoria in his book Zen at War.

Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
This forum powered by Phorum.