> What with its main holy book being centered around
> a religious war and
> pretty much every purana exploring violence and
> justifying it:
Violence characterizes this planet and humanity. Billions of killed animals - breeding. The same is seen in nature. Similarly, the brief moment of a unipolar world order was maintained by the hegemon's dominance anyway. There is also violence in religion.
> Never mind its unstoppable problem with rape,
> women abuse and religious
> intolerance of anyone that does not worship 4
> headed, four armed, monkey
> and elephant gods or the humble cow...
One or two cases of rape in Poland at the center were hushed up. It is also interesting that instead of acting wisely - due to the fact that the emergence of this fact will cause "Mission will be finished in Poland" - it was hushed up. Schematic operation. Why should one case of rape be the end of the cult in Poland? That's what Tapaysa das said. Why should one case be the end? And why this wonderful spiritual student sent by the "guru" from Hawaii, the guru of the whole world, estimated that one case of publicized rape would end the Mission in Poland. little faith? Why, according to the witnesses, was he supposed to exert severe pressure on the victim who eventually left? He could have taken the challenge, but he chose to pressure the victim. Why? Because he had nothing. No spiritual realization.
> he had hoped to create. Bhakta dating sites,
> Instagram gurus and fancy
> temples in paradise open to the yoga/hindu shmindu
> seeker of baloney.
Dating sites are indeed an interesting phenomenon. Where's the meditation? Where are the family traditions.
> Think about it. To the average Gaudya, their naive
> conception of what
> "goloka" is, is just as simplistic as the
> Christian heaven. Everyone
> just feels good, is eternaly young and all the
> animals live in peace.
An anthropomorphic, terrestrial concept. If it was a cosmic slime which it doesn't touch, it also turns into a cosmic slime, drawing satisfaction from the enlargement of the cosmic slime and matter enjoying being a space slime, and also due to the consciousness falling with the square, the possibility of meeting your own slime branch will bring joy from the lack of loneliness of the slime in space - that would actually be a different concept.
"Slime in the space!"
> Like Tusta et al, there is always a faction of
> followers touted as important and pure. Assess
> what qualities make them such and money and
> followers is close behind...
Yes, you can see that the mechanism of creating idols in the group when they leave creates the need for others to take their place. And it's even in the fingers of people like Madhava dasi - advertising Tulsi Gabbard (without researching who she is, what she does - she took money from Planned Parenthood). So is Wai Lan. It was reported by former members that before they could meet Wai Lan, they had barely watched a couple of tapes, already the lack of worship of the videotape deity was subtly stigmatized. Someone who has not seen this Chinese holiness cannot be a good sheep.
> When I went to my first Beach kirtans in Malibu as
> a child it was really the first time that I had
> witnessed such an intense paranoia, fear and
> confusion at the arrival of Chris Butler with his
> awkward wife.
How did the couple behave in public? How did it look like?
> the time. Certainly on a molecular level there is
> nothing that we can observe that has the
> definition of what we consider to be love. The
> all-loving being makes it pretty much impossible
> to love. Creating a world that cock blocks your
> attempt at every turn from knowing "him", it's a
> miracle anyone even believes in god any more.
> That's the real miracle. Millions of years of
> evolution and humans have not figured out who god
> is, where he is, and what good is he for? Rapes,
> storms, earthquakes and murders? His "holy name"
> sure as shit has not changed the ebb and flow at
> all. And we all know the definition of insanity...
> chant on your beads till you become blue in the
Well. The SIF narrative "is it love or lust" as I wrote has its limitations. The Zen master was asked about contacts with women to answer "it wasn't love, it wasn't lust". Gaudiya teachers say that lust is unfavorable when it occurs without love. So there is this duality present according to them in the physical dimension. And what can be accepted as love - Buddhist compassion for every living being, empathy supported by practical action - feeding, defense or readiness - sensitivity. But further? What is attraction, infatuation, love for a child or attraction to an animal form of a certain type - dog, monkey or cat. Horses, cows or chickens. What about unconditional love for a spider? Or to a cockroach?
> only used within the cult. Same thing with a
> preoccupation with pastoral romanticism. One can
> find its roots in all sorts of Village religions
> throughout India in the Middle East all the way
> into China and Mongolia. Never mind the growing
> pastoral romanticism present in medieval
> Christianity and many other faiths.
Romanticism. In this dimension, love cannot be romanticism. Because there is suffering. Limitations.
> Prior to the composition of the srimad bhagavatam
> there was really no Radha and Krishna cult in
> India. So, at some point this sect arose as a
> poetic fascination that took hold in the political
> and public consciousness. No real veda mentions
> krishna, hardly vishnu, let alone their supremacy.
There are some indications that the Atharvaveda elements came first. On the other hand, in the Balkan countries, in the times of Chaitanya, the tradition of singing "sevdalinka" appeared - a combination of Slavic, Turkish, Jewish and Gypsy elements.
Many geographical features in former Yugoslavia or Bulgaria bear names referring to Sanskrit terms with their sound. There Are Sanskrit archaisms in Lithuanian. Most of the symptoms are ignored. The past may not have been as reported by the Vedic groups or current science.
He described India and Israel as “ancient civilizations [that] have much in common politically and economically and share strong democratic beliefs, traditions and values.”
Geopolitically, China was the lever for the conflict with the USSR. Now that China is too much of a challenge, maintaining hegemony with India, military and financial with the UK (historical East India Company) is the focus. Worse, India likes cooperation with Russia. And the fact that the Jews came from India and were expelled or that they are a faction of the Gypsies - it is better not to raise the subject.
Common sense always necessary. And all kinds of knowledge.
By passion from ignorance...In our poverty we can by proud...